EIOPA Revises LEI Guidelines, Issues Results of Stress Test
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) revised the guidelines on Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) and expects national competent authorities to apply these revised guidelines from July 01, 2022. EIOPA also published a Decision (EIOPA-BoS-21/517) that repeals and replaces the Decision on collection of information under Solvency II (EIOPA- BoS-15/198). The new Decision will enter into force on the day following its adoption and it enhances the scope, not only with respect to Solvency II, but also addresses information on pensions (IORP) and pan-European pension products (PEPP) frameworks. The timelines, channels, and formats of submission have been updated, along with the EIOPA Taxonomy Roadmap. The revised timelines for the national authorities to submit to EIOPA the Quarterly Solvency II information affect only reporting obligations with undertaking or group submission date after the publication of this Decision. Another EIOPA update involves the publication of results of the 2021 insurance stress test, along with an associated factsheet and a set of the frequently asked questions about this exercise.
The 2021 insurance stress test assessed the industry’s resilience to a prolonged COVID-19 scenario in a “lower for longer” interest rate environment. EIOPA also performed a capital and solvency assessment and, for the first time, examined participants’ pre- and post-stress liquidity positions. The test allowed participants to calculate their post-stress position using two distinct approaches: the fixed balance sheet approach without management actions and the constrained balance sheet approach, where reactive management actions were permitted. Based on the results of this exercise, EIOPA will assess the need for issuing recommendations on relevant concerns identified in the exercise. The following are the key findings from the stress test exercise:
- Despite the grave economic and financial implications of the COVID-19 pandemic, the European insurance industry entered the stress test exercise with a strong level of capitalization—evidenced by a solvency ratio of 217.9% at the end of 2020. This robust buffer in the solvency ratio allowed participants absorb the shock of the adverse scenario.
- The capital component of the exercise confirmed that the main vulnerabilities for the sector stem from market shocks, and, specifically, from the decoupling of the risk free rate and risk premia, the so-called double-hit scenario.
- In the fixed balance sheet approach, where no management actions against the prescribed shocks could be enforced, the aggregate solvency ratio decreased by 92.1pp to 125.7%, bringing nine undertakings under the regulatory threshold of 100%. Results improved when participants, under the constrained balance sheet approach, were allowed to take reactive management actions. The actions taken reduced the original drop seen in the fixed balance sheet approach by 13.6pp to an aggregate solvency ratio of 139.3% and helped seven participants return their post-stress solvency ratios to above 100%. The insurance industry, therefore, demonstrated that it has tools at its disposal to cope with adverse market and economic effects.
- Despite the material cut in excess assets over liabilities, none of the participants reported an Assets over Liability ratio below 100%, neither under the fixed nor under the constrained balance sheet approach. This confirms the industry’s ability to meet promises to policyholders amid severe adverse developments of the economy and the markets.
- The long term guarantee measures which are part of the Solvency II regulation helped absorb part of the severe but plausible shocks, limiting the drop in participants’ solvency ratio. Nevertheless, the stress test also revealed that a section of the market still heavily relies on transitional measures, which, unlike long-term guarantees, are to be phased out by 2032. Undertakings should take concrete steps toward reducing their dependence on temporary measures that were put in place to smooth the transition from Solvency I to the Solvency II regime.
- The liquidity component of the stress test showed that the liquidity position of participants appears to be a less significant concern than solvency positions given the sector’s large holdings of liquid assets. Still, outcomes show that insurers cannot rely solely on their cash holdings to cover unexpected outflows.
Related Links
- LEI Guidelines
- Decision on Information Collection
- Taxonomy Roadmap (XLSX)
- Press Release on Insurance Stress Test
- Report on Insurance Stress Test (PDF)
- Factsheet on Stress Test (PDF)
- FAQs on Stress Test (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, IORP, PEPP, Reporting, Taxonomy, COVID-19, Stress Testing, Solvency Ratio, Liquidity Risk, LEI, Guidelines, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Karen Moss
Senior practitioner in asset and liability management (ALM) and liquidity risk who assists banking clients in advancing their treasury and balance sheet management objectives
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
EBA Enhances Proportionality in Reporting, Makes Other AnnouncementsRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.