Unlocking Trade Credit Limits for Enhanced Returns
The traditional loss-minimizing approach to managing corporate trade credit can keep write-offs low but may be overly conservative.
The key enabler in this approach is high-quality, comprehensive, and consistent probability of default data. Join us for this webinar as our credit experts demonstrate the overall economic value approach to setting credit limits and highlight the characteristics of an accounts receivable (AR) portfolio that shows significant profit growth potential.
This session will highlight:
• A comparison of traditional and economic credit limit tables
• Examples of margin-based deal pricing
• Three real-life case studies with different ratings
• Scenarios that explore real-time disruptions such as oil price shocks or COVID-19 impacts
Presentation Slides
Related Articles
How US Banks Are Addressing Climate Risk and Sustainability
This report offers our observations on key stakeholder climate reporting expectations, financial institution climate reporting approaches, and recommendations on how these can be facilitated within the US banking sector.
CECL Benchmark Q4 2020
In this paper, we provide an update, based on 14 top financial institutions, of our triangulation benchmark as of December 31, 2020 to understand the range of reserve action to be expected for Q4 2020 as well as benchmarking for Q1 2021 reserve levels.
ILM vs. CECL: What's the Difference? (December 2020 Update)
This paper compares results from CECL adopters that follow the CECL framework, non-adopter banks that follow the Incurred Loss Model (ILM) framework, and highlights the differences using weighted averages.
CECL Benchmark Q4 2020
In this paper, we provide an update, based on 14 top financial institutions, of our triangulation benchmark as of December 31, 2020 to understand the range of reserve action to be expected for Q4 2020 as well as benchmarking for Q1 2021 reserve levels.
ILM vs. CECL: What's the Difference? (December 2020 Update)
As US financial institutions have filed allowance estimates for Q3 2020, Moody’s Analytics analyzed whether Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL) leads to larger and more volatile levels of allowance than under the Incurred Loss Model (ILM).
ILM vs. CECL: What's the Difference?
This paper compares results from CECL adopters that follow the CECL framework, non-adopter banks that follow the Incurred Loss Model (ILM) framework, and highlights the differences.
CECL Benchmark Q3 2020
In this paper, we provide an update, based on 14 top financial institutions, of our triangulation benchmark as of September 30, 2020 to understand the range of reserve action to be expected for Q3 2020.
CECL Resources: A Framework and Benchmarks for Allowance Adjustments
Moody’s Analytics has developed a framework that addresses areas of uncertainty and provides ongoing comparability analysis.
Whitepaper: CECL Build – Is it Enough?
In this paper, we set out to estimate, based on 14 top financial institutions, a lower- and upper-bound current expected credit loss (CECL) estimate as of March 31, 2020.
CECL Benchmark Q2 2020
In this paper, we provide an update to the previously published research on our triangulation framework and how the set of banks in our select peer group performed relative to expectations of increased reserve build.
