General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
September 25, 2017

Dr. Andreas Dombret of the Deutsche Bundesbank spoke about the German proposal on regulatory proportionality, at the strategy conference of the Rhineland Savings Banks and Giro Association on August 29, 2017. The speech focused on regulatory proportionality for small banks and savings banks with a regional footprint and examined how the regulatory landscape might evolve for these banks.

He examined the chronology of actions taken and the ways explored toward embedding the principle of proportionality more deeply within the regulatory and supervisory frameworks. He also discussed the EC proposals for strengthening proportionality as part of the general overhaul of EU banking regulation, which is still an ongoing process. “These proposals would make major changes to the small print, and I am certain that we will be able to roll out a number of meaningful initial improvements. That said, the proposals don't go far enough—which is why we thought ahead.” To this end, he highlighted that a German discussion paper was put before the competent expert group of the EC in June this year. The paper proposes two paths toward greater proportionality and discusses the pros and cons of each: one path involves adjusting the existing regulatory framework and the second path involves creating a dedicated regulatory framework for small institutions (small banking box).


According to Dr. Dombret, the German proposal adopts a three-tiered approach to greater proportionality. In this proposal, systematically important institutions with the potential to pose systemic risk will be subject to Basel III in full while medium-sized institutions will be provided with selective relief. A stand-alone supervisory regime, known as small banking box, has been proposed for the small, less complex institutions. The paper then proposes a classification criteria for categorizing the institutions into these three tiers. It proposes no proportionality for risk-based capital ratios, leverage ratio, and liquidity coverage ratio, emphasizing “that a lot of rules are not up for debate” and “that the very purpose of our joint proposal is to avoid unnecessarily high amounts of paperwork.” It is to be noted that this debate is now at the European level and the government, supervisors, and German banking industry unanimously hold a joint position. He concludes that “we must present a united German front. If we in Germany do not manage to all stand behind the small banking box concept, we will have a hard job convincing other European countries.

 

Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Germany, Proportionality, Basel III, Small Banking Box, Bundesbank, BIS

Related Insights
News

US Agencies Extend Consultation Period for the Proposed SA-CCR

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) extended the comment period for a proposed rule to update their standards for how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts.

February 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Extends Consultation Period for Stress Testing Rule

FED has published in the Federal Register a notice proposing amendments to the company run and supervisory stress test rules.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Third Update for February 2019

EBA published answers to two questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

February 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FSB Report Examines Financial Stability Implications of Fintech

FSB published a report that assesses fintech-related market developments and their potential implications for financial stability.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

US Agencies Amend Regulatory Capital Rule to Allow Phase-In for CECL

US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted the final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under the U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; this includes banking organizations’ implementation of the current expected credit losses (CECL) methodology.

February 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

FED Issues Correction in Historical Dataset in its 2019 Stress Tests

FED identified an error in the historical dataset used in its 2019 stress tests and issued a correction.

February 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Consults on Company-Run Stress Test Requirements for Banks

OCC proposed amendments to its company-run stress testing requirements for national banks and Federal savings associations, consistent with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection (EGRRCP) Act.

February 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

CFTC Extends Comment Periods for Trade Execution Requirement Proposals

CFTC announced that it is extending comment period for the proposed amendments related to the regulations on swap execution facilities (SEF) and trade execution requirement.

February 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Updates Instructions for Basel III Monitoring Exercise

BCBS updated instructions for Basel III monitoring for the collection of December 2018 data from the participating banks.

February 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

OCC Proposes to Renew Information Collection Under Stress Test Rule

OCC is proposing to renew its information collection titled “Annual Stress Test Rule” (OMB Control No: 1557-0311). Comments must be received on or before March 13, 2019.

February 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2603