Featured Product

    IMF Reports on 2017 Article IV Consultation with Portugal

    September 15, 2017

    IMF publishes its staff report and selected issues report in the context of the 2017 Article IV consultation with Portugal. The staff report highlights that stability and confidence in the Portuguese banking system have improved, following successful efforts to raise capital. However, the IMF Directors cautioned that the large stock of nonperforming loans (NPLs) could limit banks’ ability to finance productive investment.

    In the staff report, the staff recommends boosting internal capital generation, removing the impediments to NPL resolution, and addressing the forthcoming regulatory challenges in the form of IFRS 9. There has been a modest decline in the outstanding stock of NPLs since end-2015, supported by the pickup in growth, but they remain elevated at 16.4% of total loans at end-March 2017. This weakness in asset quality remains particularly concentrated in the corporate sector, with corporate NPLs at 29.0% at end-March 2017, compared with 6.7% NPLs on household loans for house purchase and 10.0% for consumer and other loans. The Portuguese authorities emphasized that the long phasing-in of Basel III and the transition period envisaged for IFRS 9 will allow banks to meet their capital requirements smoothly as ongoing cost-cutting efforts will boost banks’ profitability and internal capital generation. Basel III will likely necessitate new equity issuance to offset the reduction in capital ratios, while the setting of Minimum Requirement for Own Funds and Eligible Facilities (MREL) targets will also likely require Portuguese banks—predominantly deposit-funded—to tap wholesale markets to comply with the minimum required level of liabilities that can absorb losses in the event of resolution. Both the Portuguese and European authorities remain cautious about the pace of NPL resolution, warning against NPL fire sales that would destroy bank capital.

     

    The selected issues report examines the challenges (including poor asset quality and weak capital adequacy) facing the banking system in Portugal. A tightening of capital requirements has already begun with the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) conducted by the European authorities on the largest banks in recent years; this tightening would continue with the imposition of a capital conservation buffer and additional systemic capital buffers by the Bank of Portugal. Nevertheless, against the background of stressed asset quality, Portugal has one of the lowest common equity tier 1 (CET1) ratios in the EU—12.6% of risk-weighted assets as of end-March 2017. The macro-prudential toolkit includes requirements for all banks to implement a capital conservation buffer of up to 2.5 percentage points of CET1 and for other systemically important institutions (O-SII) to hold a capital reserve of up to one percentage point of CET1. Given the challenges they are facing, Portuguese banks, as virtually all European banks, have thus been required to hold significant capital above the minimum regulatory level.

     

    In the context of the recovery and resolution planning cycle, banks are expected to adjust their capital and funding structure to the risks inherent in their business models. Pursuant to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD), banks’ recovery plans are required to ensure that the restoration of banks’ financial conditions, following any significant deterioration, will not have a negative effect on financial markets, other institutions, or funding conditions. To this end, banks must identify the key steps to maintain the proper functioning of their core business lines and critical functions in a situation of financial stress, and thus may have to adjust their business models accordingly. Furthermore, EBA has stressed that the calibration of the MREL target should be closely linked to the bank’s resolution strategy and business models. The impact of these clean-up efforts will be amplified by the move from the current incurred-loss model to the expected credit-loss model, in relation with the implementation of new IFRS 9 provisioning rules, from January 2018. However, the impact of this change will depend not only on the level of existing provisions under IAS 39 and current capital, but also on the method used for calculating regulatory capital. Therefore, the impact will differ for banks using standardized approach and for the few banks using internal models-based approach, or IRB, the latter being already required to deduct any shortfall of loan -oss provisions over regulatory expected losses from their CET1 ratios.

     

    Related Links

    Staff Report on Portugal (PDF)

    Selected Issues Report on Portugal (PDF)

    Keywords: Europe, Portugal, Banking, Article IV, Basel III, IFRS 9, MREL, BRRD, IMF

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    MAS Amends Notice 610 on Reporting Templates for Banks in Singapore

    MAS published amendments to Notices 610 and 1003 related to submission of statistics and returns, along with the reporting templates and frequently asked questions (FAQs) associated with these Notices.

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Updates Policy Module on Supervisory Review Process

    HKMA is issuing, by notice in the Gazette, revised versions of two Supervisory Policy Manual modules as statutory guidelines under section 7(3) of the Banking Ordinance. The Supervisory Policy Manual modules are CA-G-5 on “Supervisory Review Process” and SB-2 on “Leveraged Foreign Exchange Trading.”

    January 24, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Amends Pillar 2 Capital Framework for Banks

    PRA published the policy statement PS2/20 that contains the final amendments to the Pillar 2 framework and provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP5/19 on updates related to Pillar 2 capital framework.

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Survey Examines Progress of Central Banks Toward Digital Currency

    BIS published a paper that presents the results of a survey that asked central banks how their plans are developing in the area of central bank digital currency (CBDC).

    January 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Proposes to Revise Information Collection Under Market Risk Rule

    FED proposed to revise and extend, for three years, FR 4201, which is the information collection under the market risk capital rule.

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Consults on Stay Rules on Financial Contracts Under FIRO

    HKMA published proposals for making rules related to contractual stays on termination rights in financial contracts for authorized institutions under FIRO or the Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628).

    January 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Amends Notices on Minimum Liquid Asset Requirements for Banks

    MAS published amendments to Notices 1015, 613, and 649 related to the minimum liquid assets (MLA) requirements.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Publishes Submission on Fintech and Regtech

    APRA published its submission, to the Senate Select Committee, on financial technology and regulatory technology.

    January 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI to Implement Operational Risk Capital Rules for Banks in Q1 2022

    OSFI decided to move domestic implementation of the revised Basel III operational risk capital requirements from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2022.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Consults on Guideline on Threshold for Credit Obligations Past Due

    ECB published a draft guideline, along with the frequently asked questions (FAQs), on the definition of the materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.

    January 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4541