FASB Decides to Delay Implementation of LDTI Standard for Insurers
At the September 2020 meeting, the FASB Board discussed the feedback received on the proposed Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 with respect to the effective date and early adoption of the targeted improvements to the accounting for long-duration insurance contracts (LDTI or Topic 944). FASB decided to defer the effective date of the amendments in Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 for all insurance entities by one year. FASB also decided to amend the proposed early application provisions of Update 2018-12 whereby the early application transition date would be either the beginning of the prior period or the earliest period presented. As a next step, the Board has directed the staff to draft an Accounting Standards Update for vote by written ballot.
As per the proposal published on July 09, 2020, the Accounting Standards Update would permit insurance companies to delay implementation by one year as follows:
- For SEC filers, excluding smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC, LDTI would be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
- For all other entities, LDTI would be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025.
FASB received 28 comment letters during the consultation period, which ended on August 24, 2020. All 28 respondents supported the proposed amendments to defer the effective date of the amendments in Update 2018-12 for all entities by one year. Respondents generally noted that the deferral would enable preparers to ensure a quality implementation of the amendments in Update 2018-12, work around delays caused by COVID-19 pandemic, and educate management and external users on the effects of adopting the new amendments. The 25 respondents that provided a view about the amendment in the proposed update on early application supported the proposed amendment to change the early application transition date guidance. Those respondents noted that it would achieve a more consistent transition date for all entities and encourage accelerated delivery of information to financial statement users for those entities in a position to early adopt. One respondent (that did not provide a view on the proposed amendments on early application) noted there may be unintended consequences of the early application transition date change proposed by the Board. One respondent also suggested that the Board consider shortening the period between the required smaller reporting company determination date (November 15, 2019) and the proposed effective date for the amendments in Update 2018-12, citing that an entity may change its designation before the effective date of the amendments in Update 2018-12 and still benefit from having a later effective date.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, US, Insurance, Accounting, Topic 944, LDTI, Insurance Contracts, Implementation Timeline, COVID-19, FASB
Featured Experts
Gavin Conn
Experienced life actuary; background in economic capital modeling; ALM specialist; IFRS 17 researcher
David Fihrer
Skilled life insurance actuary; subject matter expert on IFRS 17 and source of earnings
Nick Jessop
Scenario modeling expert; risk management specialist; quantitative financial modeler
Related Articles
EBA Finalizes Templates for One-Off Climate Risk Scenario Analysis
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
EBA Mulls Inclusion of Environmental & Social Risks to Pillar 1 Rules
The European Banking Authority (EBA) recently published a report that recommends enhancements to the Pillar 1 framework, under the prudential rules, to capture environmental and social risks.
BCBS Consults on Disclosure of Crypto-Asset Exposures of Banks
As a follow on from its prudential standard on the treatment of crypto-asset exposures, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) proposed disclosure requirements for crypto-asset exposures of banks.
BCBS and EBA Publish Results of Basel III Monitoring Exercise
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) and the European Banking Authority (EBA) have published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise.
PRA Updates Timeline for Final Basel III Rules, Issues Other Updates
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) recently issued a few regulatory updates for banks, with the updated Basel implementation timelines being the key among them.
US Treasury Sets Out Principles for Net-Zero Financing
The U.S. Department of the Treasury has recently set out the principles for net-zero financing and investment.
EC Launches Survey on G7 Principles on Generative AI
The European Commission (EC) launched a stakeholder survey on the draft International Guiding Principles for organizations developing advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems.
ISSB Sustainability Standards Expected to Become Global Baseline
The finalization of the two sustainability disclosure standards—IFRS S1 and IFRS S2—is expected to be a significant step forward in the harmonization of sustainability disclosures worldwide.
IOSCO, BIS, and FSB to Intensify Focus on Decentralized Finance
Decentralized finance (DeFi) is expected to increase in prominence, finding traction in use cases such as lending, trading, and investing, without the intermediation of traditional financial institutions.
BCBS Assesses NSFR and Large Exposures Rules in US
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published reports that assessed the overall implementation of the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) and the large exposures rules in the U.S.
