FASB Decides to Delay Implementation of LDTI Standard for Insurers
At the September 2020 meeting, the FASB Board discussed the feedback received on the proposed Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 with respect to the effective date and early adoption of the targeted improvements to the accounting for long-duration insurance contracts (LDTI or Topic 944). FASB decided to defer the effective date of the amendments in Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 for all insurance entities by one year. FASB also decided to amend the proposed early application provisions of Update 2018-12 whereby the early application transition date would be either the beginning of the prior period or the earliest period presented. As a next step, the Board has directed the staff to draft an Accounting Standards Update for vote by written ballot.
As per the proposal published on July 09, 2020, the Accounting Standards Update would permit insurance companies to delay implementation by one year as follows:
- For SEC filers, excluding smaller reporting companies as defined by the SEC, LDTI would be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022 and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
- For all other entities, LDTI would be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2024 and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2025.
FASB received 28 comment letters during the consultation period, which ended on August 24, 2020. All 28 respondents supported the proposed amendments to defer the effective date of the amendments in Update 2018-12 for all entities by one year. Respondents generally noted that the deferral would enable preparers to ensure a quality implementation of the amendments in Update 2018-12, work around delays caused by COVID-19 pandemic, and educate management and external users on the effects of adopting the new amendments. The 25 respondents that provided a view about the amendment in the proposed update on early application supported the proposed amendment to change the early application transition date guidance. Those respondents noted that it would achieve a more consistent transition date for all entities and encourage accelerated delivery of information to financial statement users for those entities in a position to early adopt. One respondent (that did not provide a view on the proposed amendments on early application) noted there may be unintended consequences of the early application transition date change proposed by the Board. One respondent also suggested that the Board consider shortening the period between the required smaller reporting company determination date (November 15, 2019) and the proposed effective date for the amendments in Update 2018-12, citing that an entity may change its designation before the effective date of the amendments in Update 2018-12 and still benefit from having a later effective date.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, US, Insurance, Accounting, Topic 944, LDTI, Insurance Contracts, Implementation Timeline, COVID-19, FASB
Featured Experts
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Gavin Conn
Experienced life actuary; background in economic capital modeling; ALM specialist; IFRS 17 researcher
David Fihrer
Skilled life insurance actuary; subject matter expert on IFRS 17 and source of earnings
Previous Article
ECB Amends Annexes to Guide on Qualification of Capital InstrumentsRelated Articles
APRA Decides to Standardize Submission Date for Quarterly Reporting
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
EBA Publishes Phase 1 of Reporting Framework 3.1
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
UK Government to Set Out Rules on Wind-down of Critical Benchmarks
HM Treasury notified that, after considering all responses, the government intends to bring forward further legislation, when the Parliamentary time allows, to address issues identified in the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks.
EIOPA Launches Stress Test for Insurance Sector in EU
EIOPA launched the 2021 stress test for the insurance sector in EU.
UK Authorities Publish Third Edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid
UK authorities jointly published the third edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid setting out the planned regulatory initiatives for the next 24 months.
EC Consults on Regulation on Non-Financial Sustainability Disclosures
EC is requesting feedback on the proposed Commission Delegated Regulation on the content, methodology, and presentation of information that large financial and non-financial undertakings should disclose about their environmentally sustainable economic activities under the Taxonomy Regulation.
OSFI Outlines Prudential Policy Priorities for Coming Months
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
BIS Announces TechSprint on Innovative Green Finance Solutions
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
ACPR Publishes Version 1.0.0 of RUBA Taxonomy
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
EBA Proposed Regulatory Standards for Central Database on AML/CFT
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.
