EIOPA published an opinion on sustainability within Solvency II. In August 2018, EIOPA received a request from EC for an opinion on sustainability within Solvency II, with focus on climate change mitigation. EIOPA believes that insurers should assess their exposure to sustainability risks, which are expected to increasingly impact the insurance sector. The opinion, among other issues, addresses the integration of climate-related risks in Solvency II Pillar I requirements. EC will take the opinion into account in the preparation of its report on Solvency II Directive, which is due by January 01, 2021.
In providing this opinion, EIOPA has followed the questions posed by EC in its request and analyzed evidence collected through a public call for evidence, a confidential request for information, and a public consultation on a draft opinion on sustainability within Solvency II. EC, in its call for opinion, had requested views of EIOPA on the integration of sustainability, specifically climate-related developments, into the Solvency II framework for the valuation of assets and liabilities, investment and underwriting practices, the calibration of market and natural catastrophe risks, and the use of internal models. The opinion covers the following areas:
- The extent to which the valuation of assets and liabilities under Solvency II (can) capture sustainability factors
- How insurance and reinsurance undertakings, through their investment and underwriting practices, can account for sustainability considerations
- How/whether sustainability risks are reflected in capital charges for market and natural catastrophe risks under Solvency II
- The extent to which internal models capture sustainability risks and factors
- The way sustainability could best be taken into account across the three pillars in Solvency II
In its opinion, EIOPA calls for insurance and reinsurance undertakings to implement measures linked with climate change-related risks, especially in view of a substantial impact to their business strategy. EIOPA opines that undertakings should assess their exposure to sustainability risks, which will increasingly impact the insurance sector over the coming years and decades. EIOPA acknowledges that the medium- to long-term impacts of climate change cannot fully be captured in the Solvency II capital requirements, which have been designed to reflect the risks that undertakings are exposed to over a one-year time horizon. Therefore, EIOPA stresses the importance of scenarios analysis in insurer risk management. The scenario analysis will allow undertakings to consider the impact of sustainability risks beyond the one-year time horizon or where timing is unpredictable.
Furthermore, EIOPA is of the opinion that within a risk-based framework like Solvency II any change to capital requirements must be based on a proven risk differential compared to the status quo. Assessment of the underlying risk is, therefore, the starting point and guiding principle for the analysis and opinion on capital requirements related to sustainability. EIOPA is of the view that the current Solvency II framework does not hinder the integration of current climate change-related developments in the calibration of the standard parameters for the natural catastrophe risk module of the standard formula. A regular recalibration of the standard parameters for the natural catastrophe risk module of the standard formula (each 3 to 5 years) should take into account future developments as well as the potential effect of climate change using the latest data and science available.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, Opinion, Pillar 1, ESG, EIOPA, EC
Previous ArticleNBB Circular on Calculation of Contributions to Resolution Fund
EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.
The Standing Committee of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) recommended that a systemic risk buffer level of 4.5% for domestic exposures can be considered appropriate for addressing the identified systemic risks to the stability of the financial system in Norway.
In a recent statement, PRA clarified its approach to the application of certain EU regulatory technical standards and EBA guidelines on standardized and internal ratings-based approaches to credit risk, following the end of the Brexit transition.
In a recently published letter addressed to the G20 finance ministers and central bank governors, the FSB Chair Randal K. Quarles has set out the key FSB priorities for 2021.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the revised Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR2 or Regulation 2019/876).
ESAs published a joint supervisory statement on the effective and consistent application and on national supervision of the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector (SFDR).
EC published a public consultation on the review of crisis management and deposit insurance frameworks in EU.
HKMA announced that enhancements will be made to the Special 100% Loan Guarantee of the SME Financing Guarantee Scheme (SFGS) and the application period will be extended to December 31, 2021.
EBA launched consultations on the regulatory and implementing technical standards on cooperation and information exchange between competent authorities involved in prudential supervision of investment firms.
BoE issued a letter to the CEOs of eight major UK banks that are in scope of the first Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF) reporting and disclosure cycle.