FSI Paper Concludes Global Guidance on Bigtech Firms to be Beneficial
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that offers policy implementation insights on the regulatory initiatives developed in China, European Union, and the United States to address new challenges presented by big tech firms. The report focusses on five policy domains: competition, data, conduct of business, operational resilience, and financial stability. The report notes that there exists a compelling case to seek international consistency of policy developments.
The report highlights that the policy initiatives generally seek to achieve a balance between addressing the different risks posed by big tech firms and preserving the benefits they bring in terms of market efficiency and financial inclusion. Policy initiatives are addressing the operational resilience of big tech firms. These typically apply to big tech firms either as providers of financial services or as third-party service providers of financial firms. The recent initiatives constitute important steps in addressing risks posed by big tech firms, though additional regulatory responses might be needed. These will include the development of entity-based rules to address the unique combination of risks posed by big tech firms. These initiatives represent important steps in combating relevant risks posed by big tech firms. It seems likely at this stage that new policy developments may need to introduce further specific controls for big tech firms if they continue, as expected, gaining presence in the financial system either directly or through their engagement with financial institutions.
As big tech firms continue to gain prominence in the financial system, additional policy responses might be necessary. It is also very likely that new policy actions will largely need to follow an entity-based approach and require close cooperation between competition, data, and financial authorities. Moreover, given the cross-border scope of big tech activities, enhanced international regulatory cooperation is essential. There is already a compelling case to seek international consistency of policy developments. Given the cross-border scope of the activities performed by big tech firms, international regulatory cooperation seems essential. Several proposals have been put forward to enhance global collaboration on the design of policies aiming to address the challenges posed by digital technologies. There have also been efforts by international standard-setting bodies to ensure that existing financial regulation (particularly in the area of payments) properly covers the activity of new nonbank players. As the need for specific rules for big tech firms may gain ground in different jurisdictions, the availability of common international guidance on the matter should help contain the risk of regulatory fragmentation.
Keywords: International, Banking, Bigtech, Fintech, Operational Resilience, Regtech, Guidance, FSI, BIS
Previous ArticleFI to Ease Restrictions on Dividend Payments, Increase CCyB
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
DNB Publishes Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
DNB, the central bank of Netherlands, updated the list of additional reporting requests and published additional data quality checks and XBRL-Formula linkbase documents for the first quarter of 2023.
NBB Sets Out Climate Risk Expectations, Issues Reporting Updates
The National Bank of Belgium (NBB) published a communication on climate-related and environmental risks, issued an update on XBRL reporting
EBA Updates Address Securitization Standards and DGS Guidelines
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final draft of the regulatory technical standards that set out conditions for assessment of homogeneity of the underlying exposures in simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) securitizations.
FSB Publishes Letter to G20, Sets Out Work Priorities for 2023
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors, highlighting the work that FSB will take forward under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023
ISSB Standards May Become Effective from January 2024
The International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) welcomed the confirmation statement by the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) setting out its progress in the development of its first sustainability-related corporate disclosure standards.