HKMA published the semi-annual financial stability report for September 2020. Among other issues, the report assesses the performance of banking sector in the backdrop of ongoing crisis induced by the COVID-19 pandemic. Considering the risk factors and uncertainties identified during the assessment, the report highlights that banks should carefully assess the longer-term impact on the asset quality of their loan portfolios, particularly as the recession may weaken the repayment ability of corporates and households. As part of its Quarterly Bulletin, HKMA also published a feature article describing the latest developments in Hong Kong in the area of green and sustainable banking.
Financial stability report
The financial stability report highlights that retail banks in Hong Kong have recorded thinner profits alongside a slight deterioration in asset quality in the first half of 2020, as the economic downturn deepened amid the global COVID-19 outbreak. Nevertheless, the banking sector has remained resilient, underpinned by strong capital and liquidity positions by international standards. The consolidated total capital ratio of locally incorporated authorized institutions stayed largely unchanged at about 20.7% at the end of June 2020, compared with six months ago. The Tier 1 capital ratio edged up to 18.7%, with 16.6% being contributed by Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital. The average liquidity coverage ratio of category 1 institutions hovered at a similar level of 156.5% in the second quarter of 2020, from 159.9% in the fourth quarter of 2019, which were well above the statutory minimum requirement of 100%. The average Liquidity Maintenance Ratio of category 2 institutions mildly increased to 57.2% in the second quarter of 2020 from 56.4% in the fourth quarter of 2019, also well above the statutory minimum requirement of 25%. The average NSFR of category 1 institutions remained at a high level of 133.1% in the second quarter of 2020, well above the statutory minimum requirement of 100%.
In response to the pandemic, HKMA, together with the banking sector, has taken proactive measures to reduce cash-flow pressure on borrowers. These measures supported stable flows of credit to help the economy ride out this difficult period. Looking ahead, the banking sector in Hong Kong will continue to be challenged by a number of downside risk factors, including uncertainties over the path of global and domestic economic recovery amid the COVID-19 pandemic and rising U.S.-China tensions.
Developments in green and sustainable banking
The article on the developments in green and sustainable banking points out that HKMA is pushing ahead with its initiatives to address climate-related issues, support sustainable finance, and promote green and sustainable banking. Over the past year, a common assessment framework has been developed to measure the “greenness baseline” of individual authorized institutions; the first round of self-assessment has been completed; and a white paper has been published on green and sustainable banking to outline our initial thinking on supervisory expectations. The next step is to develop supervisory requirements on climate risk management for authorized institutions, regarding which HKMA plans to consult the industry in the first half of 2021. Apart from developing supervisory requirements, HKMA is also exploring ways to facilitate authorized institutions' management of climate-related risks and growing green businesses. For instance, HKMA will invite authorized institutions to participate in a pilot climate stress testing exercise to assess the climate resilience of the sector. Consultancy studies will also be conducted to review and address potential obstacles to the development of green and sustainable banking in Hong Kong. The goals of these initiatives are to build climate resilience within the banking system as well as to raise authorized institutions’ awareness of climate risks and broader sustainability issues.
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
HM Treasury notified that, after considering all responses, the government intends to bring forward further legislation, when the Parliamentary time allows, to address issues identified in the consultation on supporting the wind-down of critical benchmarks.
EIOPA launched the 2021 stress test for the insurance sector in EU.
UK authorities jointly published the third edition of Regulatory Initiatives Grid setting out the planned regulatory initiatives for the next 24 months.
EC is requesting feedback on the proposed Commission Delegated Regulation on the content, methodology, and presentation of information that large financial and non-financial undertakings should disclose about their environmentally sustainable economic activities under the Taxonomy Regulation.
OSFI has set out the near-term priorities for federally regulated financial institutions and federally regulated private pension plans for the coming months until March 31, 2022.
Under the Italian G20 Presidency, BIS Innovation Hub and the Italian central bank BDI launched the second edition of the G20 TechSprint on the lookout for innovative solutions to resolve operational problems in green and sustainable finance.
ACPR published Version 1.0.0 of the RUBA taxonomy, which will come into force from the decree of January 31, 2022.
EBA proposed the regulatory technical standards on a central database on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) in EU.