EIOPA is consulting on a supervisory statement on the use of risk mitigation techniques by insurance and reinsurance undertakings. Supervisory authorities are recommended to also apply this Supervisory Statement to insurance and reinsurance undertakings that make use of an internal model to calculate the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR). During the consultation period, EIOPA will additionally assess potential "group issues" and "internal reinsurance." The deadline for submission of feedback to this consultation is November 24, 2020.
This Supervisory Statement is the result of analyses on the use of reinsurance structures by insurance and reinsurance undertakings that optimize the use of capital under the Solvency II framework,
when the Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) is calculated with the standard formula. The use of risk mitigation techniques can have a significant impact on the SCR. For non-life insurance, it impacts the "premium and reserve risk" and the "catastrophe risk." For life insurance, due to the newly developed structures, reinsurance contracts or other contracts that are structured as reinsurance contracts can also impact other risk modules—for example, lapse risk, longevity risk, or even expense risk. The overall impact can significantly reduce the SCR of an insurance and reinsurance undertaking and, therefore, supervisory authorities are recommended to give appropriate attention to this subject.
Independently from the eligibility criteria for recognizing risk mitigation techniques for solvency purposes, insurance and reinsurance undertakings are expected to ensure that risk mitigation is commensurate with the relief in the SCR calculation when introducing new techniques. Undertakings are required, as part of the general governance requirements, to manage risk prudently. Although the use of risk mitigation techniques in general is a good tool to mitigate the (insurance) risk, it should be recognized that the transfer of risk might introduce other risks—that is, a possible increase in counterparty default risk, basis risk and depending on the structure, concentration risk.
This Supervisory Statement should be read in conjunction with the Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC), the Commission Delegated Regulation 2015/35, EIOPA guidelines on system of governance, and EIOPA guidelines on basis risk. The statement is intended to promote supervisory convergence on the assessment of the use of risk mitigation techniques under Solvency II, as it is recognized that potential divergent practices or potential supervisory arbitrage in this area could contribute to an unlevel playing field.
Comment Due Date: November 24, 2020
Previous ArticleHKMA Report Examines Financial Stability of Banking Sector
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)