ISDA Updates Product Table on RFR Conventions and IBOR Fallbacks
ISDA has amended the standard documentation for interest rate derivatives that reference key interbank offered rates (IBORs) to include information on fallback rates that will apply on the permanent discontinuation of these IBORs and, in the case of LIBOR, if LIBOR becomes "non-representative." The amended document includes a table that sets out how the fallbacks would function for different products, including certain non-linear products. For comparison, the chart sets out standard conventions for the same products that reference IBORs and the standard and/or expected conventions for such products that reference risk-free rates (RFRs) as of the date of the document. ISDA has also published a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) on IBOR fallback rate adjustments.
Counterparties may include the amended documentation with the fallback triggers and rates in their legacy transactions by either adhering to a "protocol" published by ISDA or entering into bilateral amendments. The fallback rates referenced in the amended documentation will be as published by Bloomberg for the relevant IBOR and tenor. The amended ISDA documentation will direct counterparties to first apply linear interpolation if the relevant IBOR is available for the next longer and next shorter tenor. If linear interpolation is not available, counterparties are directed to use the published fallback rate that corresponds to the date on which they were to reference the relevant IBOR, provided that this fallback rate appears on the relevant screen at least two business days prior to the relevant payment date. If the fallback rate for the referenced IBOR’s original fixing date is not produced by Bloomberg two business days prior to the payment date, then the amended documentation of ISDA provides for counterparties to reference the fallback rate that has been published for the most recent original fixing date for the relevant IBOR in the relevant tenor.
ISDA has produced language that counterparties could use to replace the fallbacks with triggers and fallbacks that duplicate those in hedged instruments. For certain products, counterparties may want to consider whether to amend the business days or payment dates and/or agree to use a fallback rate for a date other than the referenced IBOR’s original fixing date. In some cases, such amendments may better align the outcomes with the counterparties’ original intentions and/or with the desired outcomes for hedged instruments. Any such amendments would be strictly based on agreements between the relevant counterparties. The documentation of each transaction remains the responsibility of the parties concerned.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Interest Rate Benchmarks, IBOR, Derivatives, Risk-Free Rate, LIBOR, Benchmark Reforms, Benchmark Fallbacks ISDA
Previous Article
OSFI to Focus on Prudential Implications of AML/ATF ComplianceRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
