SRB launched the process for the 2020 data collection cycle for resolution reporting. SRB will collect data from banks, via the national resolution authorities, for banks under the SRB remit. National resolution authorities will inform banks of their resolution reporting obligations in October 2019, once these have been finalized in collaboration with SRB. The deadline for delivery by banks to the national resolution authorities is March 31, 2020 for the Liability reports, with main report in XBRL and Additional Liability Data in Excel. All other resolution reports are due by banks by April 30, 2020.
During the 2020 edition, the collection will be based on data as at December 31, 2019. The scope of the reports has evolved to reflect the needs for resolution planning, while limiting the burden of reporting for the banks. In terms of content and format of the data request, SRB has made an effort to align with the EBA reporting framework 2.9. Where necessary to fulfill its mandate as Group Level Resolution Authority, SRB has extended the data request. SRB will be requesting Additional Liability Data in preparation for the 2020 resolution planning cycle. This data request is aligned with the ongoing work undertaken at EBA on the development of implementing technical standards on reporting, while addressing certain specificities of the resolution strategies. Given the temporary nature of this data request, the data collection for this specific report will be in Excel format in 2020. This data may be collected in XBRL in future collections if fully integrated to the implementing technical standards of EBA.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Reporting, Resolution Planning, Framework 2.9, National Resolution Authorities, SRB
Previous ArticleBDE Releases Technical Instructions for Financial Reporting by Banks
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.