BoE published a report on the high-level findings of cyber simulation exercise in the financial sector. The exercise, which took place on November 09, 2018, explored the resilience of financial sector to a major cyber incident impacting the UK. The exercise was commissioned by the Cross Market Operational Resilience Group jointly chaired by BoE and UK Finance. The exercise demonstrated that recommendations from the last sector exercise have been implemented and identified further opportunities for improvement.
The exercise also successfully rehearsed work of the Cross Market Business Continuity Group, an executive-level group chaired by BoE to enable financial authorities (BoE, PRA, FCA, and HM Treasury) to interact with the sector during times of major operational disruption. Along with the financial authorities, participants included 29 of the most systemically important firms and Financial Market Infrastructures. Participants responded to a severe but plausible cyber-attack scenario targeting the sector. The following are the key findings and recommendations of the exercise:
- Opportunities to improve the way firms coordinate at an operational level during incidents that impact the sector. To address the improvements, a review of the sector response framework will be undertaken to ensure that the sector can communicate and co-ordinate at an operational level during a crisis. In addition the Finance Sector Cyber Collaboration Center (FSCCC) will also be integrated into the response framework to ensure that the technical coordination capability it provides is incorporated into the broader response landscape.
- Disparity in risk tolerance for suspending services could impact the functioning of the financial sector. In the case of system integrity issues, participant decision making and risk appetite for suspending services varied significantly. The future work will focus on the production of industry guidelines and good practice for managing potential controlled suspension of services and system integrity risks.
- Recovery of services is impacted by differences in the way data is stored across the financial sector. The exercise found that the ability of participants to support another operationally paralyzed bank is constrained by the different ways in which data is stored. This restricts how contingencies could be used for the benefit of the sector as a whole. To improve response capability, work will be completed to scope the technical and data requirements for providing services via alternative channels. This will be followed by a strategy paper and playbook to support coordination of this contingency during a live incident.
- Effective and consistent communications are key to maintaining customer and market confidence. The exercise recognized the importance of effective communications in maintaining customer and market confidence in the system. It demonstrated that use of UK Finance’s incident management communications framework and coordination has significantly improved collective communications, with public lines developed in under an hour. To improve consistency and clarity of often complex technical messaging, future work will focus on the production of industry guidelines on good incident communications practices and consistent definition and use of terminology.
The financial authorities, in partnership with financial sector firms, will act on the recommendations resulting from this exercise and will work to deliver improvements to the resilience and response capability of the financial sector. Delivery against these recommendations has already been initiated and is planned to continue into 2020.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Cyber Risk, Operational Risk, Cyber Simulation Exercise, Cyber Resilience, UK Finance, BoE
Previous ArticleIASB Consults on Amendments to IFRS 17 on Insurance Contracts
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.