European Council notified that EU ambassadors agreed with the position of the Council on a proposal to create an EU-wide classification system, or taxonomy, to provide businesses and investors with a common language to identify what economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. At present, there is no common classification system at EU or global level to define an environmentally sustainable economic activity. The proposed regulation is meant to reduce fragmentation resulting from market-based initiatives and national practices and to reduce the practice of marketing financial products as green or sustainable, when in fact they do not meet basic environmental standards. According to the Council position, the taxonomy should be established by the end of 2021, to ensure its full application by end of 2022.
As set out in the European Council position, the proposal identifies and defines six EU environmental objectives—climate change mitigation; climate change adaptation; sustainable use and protection of water and marine resources; transition to a circular economy, including waste prevention and recycling; pollution prevention and control; and protection and restoration of biodiversity and ecosystems. To qualify as environmentally sustainable, economic activities would have to fulfill the following requirements:
- Contribute substantively to at least one of the six environmental objectives
- Not significantly harm any of the environmental objectives
- Be carried out in compliance with minimum social and governance safeguards
- Comply with specific technical screening criteria
EC would then be tasked to establish the actual classification by defining technical screening criteria for each relevant environmental objective. Legally, the criteria would take the form of delegated acts regarding the sector classification of economic activities. They would be supplemented by the implementing acts defining quantitative and qualitative thresholds that must be met by an economic activity that is to be considered environmentally sustainable. EC would be assisted by a technical expert group, "Platform on sustainable finance," which would be mandated to provide advice for developing the technical screening criteria and analyze their impact in terms of potential costs and benefits of their application. In addition, EC will be advised by an expert group consisting of experts from member states on the appropriateness of the technical screening criteria. The European Parliament voted on its position in March 2019. Negotiations between the Council and the Parliament are, therefore, ready to start.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Taxonomy, ESG, Climate Change Risk, European Parliament, European Council
Previous ArticleOSFI Updates Manual of Reporting Forms and Instructions for Insurers
Next ArticlePRA Consults on PRA110 Reporting Frequency Threshold
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.