IMF published its staff report and selected issues report in context of the 2019 Article IV consultation with New Zealand. Directors highlighted that the scope for easing macro-prudential restrictions is limited, given the still-high macro-financial vulnerabilities. RBNZ has also proposed an increase in capital requirements for banks, in line with the recommendation under the 2017 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). Directors believe that the proposed higher capital conservation buffers would provide for a welcome increase in banking system resilience.
The staff report highlights that RBNZ has proposed an increase in capital requirements to lower the probability of bank failure. The proposed increase would entail a rise in the required capital conservation buffer from 2.5% to 7.5% of risk-weighted assets (RWA) and increases for other buffers. The proposed increase would raise the tier 1 minimum capital adequacy requirements from 8.5% of RWA to 16% for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and 15% for smaller banks. The proposed increase in the ’ capital conservation buffer of banks would result in a welcome reduction in systemic financial risks. The material increase in the requirements is consistent with the 2017 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP) recommendation to raise capital buffers in view of the systemic financial risks emanating from the dominance of the four large banks in the financial system. RBNZ is reviewing the proposed changes to the capital framework and a decision is expected in November 2019.
There is scope for some flexibility in the final settings for key parameters in the new bank capital framework. The IMF staff believes that there is a strong case to double the new buffer for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIB buffer) to 2% since much of the structural systemic financial risks identified in the FSAP arise from the D-SIBs. There would also be scope for a somewhat smaller increase in the general conservation buffer, given that other regulatory changes since the global financial crisis are also likely to have lowered the probability of bank failure. Alternatively, RBNZ could evaluate whether a mix of tier 1 and tier 2 capital could provide for a similar strengthening of the loss absorbency provided by capital buffer of banks. Finally, the phase-in period could be set flexibly to ease the transition. However, staff noted that a stronger bank supervision regime would still be needed, to complement the higher capital requirements.
The report highlights that RBNZ relaxed macro-prudential policy as macro-financial risks continued to ease. The loan-to-value (LTV) ratio restrictions on the new mortgage loans of banks were relaxed on the assessment that both mortgage credit growth and house price inflation had eased to more sustainable rates, reducing the riskiness of new housing lending of banks. Ongoing Phase Two of the review of the RBNZ Act focuses on updating the regulatory, supervisory, and macro-prudential functions. The government has announced its in-principle decision after Phase 2A of the public consultation to introduce a deposit insurance framework as part of the overhaul of the crisis-management framework. The staff welcomes the in-principle decision to adopt a deposit insurance framework, a move recommended by the 2017 FSAP. The staff report also emphasizes the importance of continued operational independence and additional resources to strengthen the supervisory and regulatory functions of RBNZ.
The selected issues report focuses on the role and interaction between monetary policy and other policies affecting financial stability, particularly the macro-prudential policy. Another focus is structural vulnerabilities in the housing sector, as these vulnerabilities are the origin of much of the current financial stability concerns.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, Macro-Prudential Policy, FSAP, Article IV, LTV, Systemic Risk, Capital Buffer, RWA, Capital Adequacy, Deposit Insurance, RBNZ, IMF
Previous ArticleHKMA on Commencement of Regulatory Regime Under Insurance Ordinance
EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).
EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.
BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.
PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.
FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.
Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.
FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.
ECB published results of the quarterly lending survey conducted on 143 banks in the euro area.
ESAs published the final draft implementing technical standards on reporting of intra-group transactions and risk concentration of financial conglomerates subject to the supplementary supervision in EU.