APRA Observations from Thematic Review on Recovery Plans of Insurers
APRA issued a letter to general insurers and life insurers, outlining observations from a recent thematic review on recovery planning by insurers. The attachment to the letter presents key observations of APRA, along with certain best-practice examples. APRA conducted this thematic review with a group of in-scope large and medium-size general insurers and life insurers, assessing their recovery plans against the recovery planning guidance provided to the in-scope insurers. APRA will use the outcomes of the thematic review to inform its development of a prudential framework for recovery and resolution, which will include a prudential standard and the accompanying guidance. APRA plans to consult on this framework next year.
APRA observed that the recovery planning process has assisted in-scope insurers to advance their overall approach to risk management and to build a better understanding of the importance of recovery planning. However, considerable scope for improvement remains, before in-scope insurers can be assessed to have credible plans in place that are effectively integrated with the risk management framework. APRA considers usability of the recovery plan as a key factor in assessing its credibility. APRA expects recovery planning to be a dynamic process, wherein the plans continue to be assessed, tested, and improved with ongoing board oversight. The key observations include the following:
- Governance. Robust governance arrangements are essential both for effectively developing and maintaining the recovery plan and for ensuring that appropriate monitoring and escalation processes are in place to allow for timely implementation of recovery options. This includes integration with risk management framework; monitoring, escalation, and activation processes; and operational testing.
- Trigger frameworks. The trigger framework should operate in a manner that reflects the escalating nature of stress events, to facilitate timely contingency planning and the intensifying of responses as the severity increases. The areas of better practice are related to a range of metrics and timely trigger points.
- Recovery options. The core element of a credible recovery plan is a comprehensive menu of realistic recovery options, supported by the requisite level of supporting analysis required to assess and implement the options. APRA lists areas of better practice with respect to menu of recovery options, valuations and assumptions of recovery options, and supporting analysis for recovery options.
- Scenario analysis. The use of scenario analysis provides an important mechanism to help assess the credibility of the recovery plan, in particular the calibration of the trigger framework and feasibility of recovery options. The scenarios, therefore, need to be sufficiently severe to activate the recovery plan.
Related Link: APRA Letter (PDF)
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Insurance, Recovery and Resolution, Thematic Review, Governance, Recovery Planning, APRA
Related Articles
PRA Proposes Changes to Consolidated Prudential Rules Under CRD5/CRR2
PRA proposed rules (in CP12/21) for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies that have been approved or designated in accordance with Part 12B of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA).
ECB Extends Leverage Ratio Relief for Banks Until March 2022
ECB Banking Supervision announced that euro area banks it directly supervises may continue to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio until March 2022.
OSFI Consults on Treatment of Credit Valuation Adjustments
OSFI decided to increase the Domestic Stability Buffer from 1.00% to 2.50% of total risk-weighted assets, with effect from October 31, 2021.
HKMA Requires Banks to Submit Plans for Fintech Adoption
HKMA is requesting banks to participate in a tech baseline assessment, which forms part of the HKMA Fintech 2025 strategy.
OSFI Consults on Operational Risk Capital Data Management Expectations
OSFI published two documents to consult on the management of operational risk capital data for institutions required, or for those applying, to use the Basel III standardized approach for operational risk capital in Canada.
NGFS on Addressing Financial Stability Issues from Biodiversity Loss
The NGFS Study Group on Biodiversity and Financial Stability published a Vision paper exploring the case for action in addressing the financial stability concerns arising from biodiversity loss.
ACPR Publishes CREDITIMMO Version 2.3.0 Taxonomy for Banks
ACPR published the final version of CREDITIMMO 2.3.0 taxonomy for the decree of October 31, 2021.
EC Prolongs Italian Guarantee Scheme for Non-Performing Loans
EC, has approved, under the EU State Aid rules, the fourth prolongation of the Italian guarantee scheme to facilitate the securitization of non-performing loans.
ECB Amends Guideline on Temporary Collateral Easing Measures
ECB published Guideline 2021/975, which amends Guideline ECB/2014/31, on the additional temporary measures relating to Eurosystem refinancing operations and eligibility of collateral.
EIOPA Releases Report on Artificial Intelligence Governance Principles
EIOPA published a report, from the Consultative Expert Group on Digital Ethics, that sets out artificial intelligence governance principles for an ethical and trustworthy artificial intelligence in the insurance sector in EU.
