The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD). The revised guidelines extend the scope of the deposit guarantee schemes stress testing by requiring more tests in comparison with the past guidelines and by covering all the legal missions entrusted to the deposit guarantee schemes. These guidelines set out the scope of deposit guarantee schemes stress tests; they also set out the established priority tests that deposit guarantee schemes are required to perform and report results on by means of a dedicated reporting template. The deadline for deposit guarantee schemes to submit their next reporting template is set for June 16, 2024 while the revised guidelines will apply from September 15, 2021.
The EBA revised the existing guidelines to further strengthen the stress testing framework of deposit guarantee schemes, harmonize the approaches across member states, and enhance comparability of test results. The revised guidelines require that all deposit guarantee schemes test their abilities to perform all their functions and to access all their funding sources. The revisions are also intended to strengthen the cooperation between deposit guarantee schemes and other authorities by requiring deposit guarantee schemes to stress test scenarios where such cooperation is necessary. The new provisions encourage the deposit guarantee schemes to stress test scenarios with additional business continuity challenges, such as a pandemic, information and communications technology (ICT) failures, or other similar events. The revisions aim to consolidate depositor confidence about the ability of their national deposit guarantee schemes to promptly repay their funds in case of banking failure and to help EBA carry out a robust peer review of the national deposit guarantee scheme stress tests in 2025.
The original guidelines only requested stress testing of deposit guarantee schemes' ability to reimburse depositors. The revised guidelines also require the deposit guarantee schemes to stress test their ability to have access, in due time, to all of their funding sources, including extraordinary ex-post contributions and alternative funding arrangements (irrespective of the amount of available ex-ante funds collected by the deposit guarantee schemes). The incorporated amendments strengthen cooperation between the deposit guarantee schemes and different authorities by requiring the stress testing of interventions where cooperation with other authorities is necessary. They additionally encourage the deposit guarantee schemes to choose stress-testing scenarios with additional business continuity challenges or external circumstances that create extra stress for the deposit guarantee schemes to perform their functions, such as a pandemic, ICT failures, or other such events. Furthermore, during the March 2021 public consultation on the draft of these revised guidelines, some respondents highlighted the significant extension of the reporting template guidelines in comparison with the one appended to the former guidelines. In response to this, additional dropdown menus and binary (yes-or-no) questions have been inserted to make the completion of the template by the deposit guarantee schemes more efficient.
Effective Date: September 15, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Deposit Guarantee Schemes, DGSD, Stress Testing, Guidance, ICT Risk, EBA
Previous ArticleEBA Finalizes Guidance to Assess Breaches of Large Exposure Limits
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is seeking comments, until October 21, 2022, on the introduction of CPS 230, which is the new cross-industry prudential standard on operational risk management.