Featured Product

    Randal Quarles of FED on Refining Stress Capital Buffer Framework

    September 05, 2019

    Randal K. Quarles of FED spoke at the Program on International Financial Systems Conference in Germany. As FED has been considering refinements to the stress testing and capital frameworks, he highlighted that two goals have been at the forefront—to simplify these frameworks to make them easier to apply and understand and to maintain the overall high level of loss-absorbing capacity in the banking system. Last year, FED had issued a proposal on the stress capital buffer (SCB) to simplify regulatory regime by integrating the stress test with the non-stress capital rules. Instead of finalizing the SCB for the 2019 stress test cycle as planned earlier, the SCB framework is now expected to be in place for the 2020 stress tests.

    For large bank holding companies, SCB would replace the fixed-for-all-times-and-for-all-banks 2.5% risk-based capital buffer with a firm-specific buffer based on the most recent stress test results of a firm. This would integrate the stress testing capital requirements with the point-in-time capital requirements. Based on the feedback to the proposal, Mr. Quarles emphasized on two elements of the proposal that he believes should not be a part of the final framework. One of these elements is the requirement for stress leverage buffer and the second element is the requirement for banks to pre-fund the next four quarters of their planned dividend payments. The stress tests currently require banks to set aside sufficient capital to "pre-fund" expected capital distributions, both dividends and repurchases, for all nine quarters of the capital planning horizon. Removing the pre-funding of dividend requirement would simplify the SCB proposal, said Mr. Quarles. 

    As an alternative to requiring pre-funding dividends and in furtherance of the other goals, he suggested two co-equal options that would simplify capital requirements while limiting procyclicality. These two options are consistent with the goal of maintaining the overall levels of capital in the banking system—to set the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) at a higher baseline level during normal times and to raise the "floor," or the minimum level, of stress capital buffer. While FED has maintained the CCyB at zero since 2016, other countries have adjusted their CCyB in response to vulnerabilities in their financial sectors or, in the case of the UK, to integrate the CCyB with its structural capital requirements. Under the British framework, the CCyB would equal a positive amount in standard risk conditions. The effect of the policy is that the buffer can be varied in line with the changing risks that the banking system faces over time. He highlighted that the application of the UK approach in the United States could provide a flexible mechanism that could complement other modifications to the SCB framework and allow FED to adjust capital requirements as financial risks are evolving. 

    Mr. Quarles mentioned another equally viable alternative to turning on the CCyB, which involves raising the proposed SCB floor from the fixed 2.5% of risk-weighted assets to a somewhat higher level. This approach would have three significant benefits compared to the CCyB option: greater simplicity, transparency, and predictability. However, the higher fixed floor option has some drawbacks as well. For firms whose losses are typically close to the existing 2.5% floor, this change will affect them more than others and produce a capital regime with slightly less risk-sensitivity. In terms of targeting procyclicality, this approach would be much less direct, as opposed to more actively managing the level of the CCyB. 

    Before finalizing the SCB framework, FED plans to solicit public comment on potential revisions to the SCB proposal from last year, through the standard rule-making process, and this consultation is expected to be launched "in the near future." Mr. Quarles expects that the FED will maintain the basic SCB framework while incorporating some additional refinements, such as to address volatility and provide better notice for firms in planning their capital actions. He concluded that the refinements that are being considered to the SCB framework would improve the efficiency, coherence, and transparency of the regulatory capital framework and the core principles of the stress testing program (that have proven to be successful). 

     

    Related Link: Speech

     

    Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Stress Testing, CCyB, Stress Capital Buffer, Regulatory Capital, Loss-Absorbing Capacity, Financial Stability, FED

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BOE Article Explains Process for Bank Authorization in UK

    BoE published an article, in the Quarterly Bulletin for the third quarter of 2019, on how banks are authorized in the UK.

    September 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA on Commencement of Regulatory Regime Under Insurance Ordinance

    HKMA announced the commencement of new licensing and regulatory regime for insurance intermediaries under the Insurance Ordinance from September 23, 2019.

    September 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Standard on Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA revised CPS 226, which is the prudential standard on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SEC Adopts Rules and Amendments Under Regulatory Regime for Swaps

    SEC announced that it took a significant step toward establishing the regulatory regime for security-based swap dealers (SBSDs) by adopting a package of rules and rule amendments under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Welcomes ISDA Protocol on Narrowly Tailored Credit Events

    FCA published an update to its initial joint statement with the U.S. SEC and CFTC on opportunistic strategies in the credit derivatives markets.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Consultation on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP22/19, has set out its proposed expectations for investment by firms, in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle (PPP).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposal on Probability of Default and LGD Estimation

    PRA proposed, via the consultation paper CP21/19, an approach to implementing EBA’s recent regulatory products relating to Probability of Default (PD) estimation, Loss Given Default (LGD) estimation, and the treatment of defaulted exposures in the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Formalizes Agreement to Set Up Innovation Hub in Hong Kong SAR

    BIS and HKMA signed the Operational Agreement on the BIS Innovation Hub Center in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Observations from Thematic Review on Recovery Plans of Insurers

    APRA issued a letter to general insurers and life insurers, outlining observations from a recent thematic review on recovery planning by insurers.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BNM Publishes Financial Stability Review for the First Half of 2019

    BNM published Financial Stability Review for the first half of 2019.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3853