MAS published its reply to the Parliamentary questions on the EC decision to repeal equivalence status for credit rating agencies (CRAs) in Singapore. Some media reports might have given the impression that EC is reducing its market access to financial institutions in Singapore. Tharman Shanmugaratnam, a Senior Minister and Minister in charge of MAS, explained that the EC decision covers only CRAs, for which it still allows the use of endorsement approach, and does not extend to any other financial services.
Furthermore, EC recognizes CRAs in a third country through two approaches. First, deeming the third country’s CRA rules as equivalent to EC rules, which is called the equivalence decision. Second, an endorsement approach, where the CRAs in the third country rely on their related entities in EU to endorse their ratings. CRAs in Singapore have been using the endorsement approach and EC has confirmed that it will continue to recognize Singapore-based CRAs using this approach.
The CRA regulatory regime of MAS is based on, and consistent with, the standards promulgated by IOSCO. EC has assessed the CRA regulatory regime of MAS to be less prescriptive than EU rules in certain areas, such as in defining specific situations in which a conflict of interest for the CRA arises. MAS takes a more principles-based approach. It nevertheless requires conflicts of interest to be effectively addressed and is fully in line with international standards. Mr. Shanmugaratnam highlighted that Singapore is in good standing with EU. MAS will continue to closely engage its EU counterparts in reviewing the rules to ensure that financial institutions in Singapore continue to have access to the EU market in various financial services.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Securities, CRAs, Credit Ratings, Equivalence Decisions, Endorsement Regime, EC, MAS
Previous ArticleEBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for October 2019
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.