The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published the second Trends, Risks and Vulnerabilities report of 2021. In addition to the risk assessment, the report discusses key trends, including those related to market-based finance, sustainable finance, and innovation. The report presents in-depth articles that focus on the financial stability risks of cloud outsourcing, market for small credit rating agencies in European Union, and the environmental impact and liquidity of green bonds.
The report notes that sustainable finance continues to expand in Europe, as reflected in the 20% growth of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) fund assets and the 40% increase in outstanding sustainable debt instruments outstanding from the end of 2020. Recent corporate announcements on "net zero" emission reduction targets mark a step forward but lack consistency and details. ESG equity benchmarks delivered a mixed performance relative to non-ESG indices while the equity valuation of clean energy firms increased markedly in two years, despite similar returns on equity to fossil fuel firms. Flows into ESG funds accelerated, with impact and environmental funds being the fastest-growing strategies. Green bonds continue to dominate the ESG bond market while social bond issuance has accelerated. Four firms—Sustainalytics, Cicero, Moody's Vigeo Eiris, and ISSOekom—account for 75% of the market share of green bond external reviews in European Union. Innovation can support sustainability by addressing ESG information gaps through green financial technology (fintech) solutions, but the environmental cost of one particular innovation—cryptocurrencies—is soaring. Meanwhile, decentralized finance continues to gain momentum and regulator engagement with fintech through innovation hubs and regulatory sandboxes is becoming mainstream across European Union, with benefits for both parties.
On of the four in-depth articles in the report analyzes the growing use of cloud service providers by financial institutions and how the concentration of those providers can create financial stability risks in case of outage. The article notes that high concentration in cloud service providers could create financial stability risks if an outage at a cloud service provider affects many of its clients, increasing the likelihood of simultaneous outages. Analysis using a stylized model calibrated with operational risk data suggests that cloud service providers need to be significantly more resilient than firms to improve the safety of the financial system. In financial settings where only longer (multi-period) outages cause systemic costs, the results suggest that cloud service providers can best address systemic risks by strongly reducing incident resolution times, rather than incident frequency. In the model, using a backup, a cloud service provider successfully mitigates the systemic risk caused by cloud service providers. However, back-up requirements may need to be mandated, as the systemic risk is an externality to individual firms. Finally, there is a clear need for detailed data on outages by financial institutions and cloud service providers.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Suptech, Fintech, Regtech, Sustainable Finance, ESG, Green Bonds, Cloud Service Providers, Operational Risk, ESMA
Previous ArticleEC Issues Update on Paris Agreement Commitments at COP26
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.