Featured Product

    Agustín Carstens of BIS on Role of Proportionality in Tackling Risks

    October 30, 2018

    In a keynote address at the 13th ASBA-BCBS-FSI High-level Meeting on "Global and Regional Supervisory Priorities," Agustín Carstens, the General Manager of BIS, focused on possible ways to mitigate the previously identified risks that led to the global financial crisis and the emerging risks arising as a result of innovative technologies. He discussed the relevance of achieving a timely and adequate implementation of the post-crisis reforms, with an emphasis on the role that proportionality could play in dealing with some of the challenges that may arise in this implementation process. With respect to the emerging risks, he elaborated on the potential disruption that innovative technologies may cause in the financial system landscape and how to go about regulating them to maximize their benefits and to minimize their risks.

    With the bulk of regulatory changes broadly complete, the focus shifts to implementation into national law, which must be consistent and timely. A forthcoming Financial Stability Institute (FSI) survey on the implementation of the Basel framework shows that many non-Basel Committee members in Latin America have implemented, or are in the process of implementing, relevant pieces of the Basel III framework. The most common elements implemented, or in the pipeline, are the definition of capital and the revised operational risk framework. Additionally, most of the surveyed jurisdictions in the region do not seem to be prioritizing the implementation of the liquidity standards, possibly owing to the complexity of the new standards and the consequent regulatory burden. Consequently, many jurisdictions have started implementing simplified prudential approaches for small and less complex financial institutions. However, in several jurisdictions that have implemented proportionality in prudential regulation, simplified approaches are typically more stringent than international standards. The adoption of a proportionate regulatory approach should avoid over-protecting inefficient institutions from competitive forces. These forces are likely to be relevant in a context in which technological innovations are likely to alter in a significant way the competitive position of different types of financial institutions, thus leading to a substantial modification of the structure of the banking industry.

    Next, he discussed the challenges posed by technological developments. For example, while the new entrants will bring competition in the market for some non-core financial services, this may also trigger more concentration on traditional intermediation activities, as technology will normally increase economies of scale in the provision of those services. In addition, the increased participation of non-regulated (or lightly regulated) institutions in activities such as the provision of payment services, or the creation of opaque means of payment through distributed ledger technologies, may support some illegal activities. Also, a rapid and disorderly development of new investment products could weaken consumer protection. Furthermore, a generalized reliance of financial institutions on a small group of third-party providers of technological services generates business continuity risks that could become systemic. The intensive use of automated systems by financial institutions and other providers of financial services does exacerbate cyber-security risks and challenges the protection of customer data. Given these risks, effective regulatory action seems indispensable to promote the orderly assimilation of innovations.

    Mr. Carstens added that effective regulation should be proportionate, holistic, and coordinated at the global level. He added that close cooperation between regulators and firms developing innovations may steepen the learning curve for public authorities and, thus, facilitate the required proportionality of the regulatory action. This is why the creation of regulatory sandboxes, sponsored in many cases by the regulators themselves, is a valid initiative. Technological development is a global phenomenon, as innovations are rapidly spread out internationally and providers of new services and products often act on a cross-border basis, taking advantage of the new virtual distribution channels. It is, therefore, essential to guarantee appropriate cooperation among relevant authorities worldwide and, once sufficient experience is accumulated, to start developing new global regulatory standards to address the relevant policy issues. The international cooperation arrangements already in place, that we call the Basel Process, are well-suited to facilitate the required interaction among regulators. Yet, given the multidisciplinary nature of the policy challenges, the existing structures may have to be adjusted to ensure sufficient involvement of all relevant players beyond financial regulators. 

     

    Related Link: Speech

    Keywords: International, Banking, Fintech, Regtech, Cyber Risk, Proportionality, BIS

    Related Articles
    News

    BOE Article Explains Process for Bank Authorization in UK

    BoE published an article, in the Quarterly Bulletin for the third quarter of 2019, on how banks are authorized in the UK.

    September 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA on Commencement of Regulatory Regime Under Insurance Ordinance

    HKMA announced the commencement of new licensing and regulatory regime for insurance intermediaries under the Insurance Ordinance from September 23, 2019.

    September 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Standard on Margin Rules for Uncleared Derivatives

    APRA revised CPS 226, which is the prudential standard on margin and risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SEC Adopts Rules and Amendments Under Regulatory Regime for Swaps

    SEC announced that it took a significant step toward establishing the regulatory regime for security-based swap dealers (SBSDs) by adopting a package of rules and rule amendments under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Welcomes ISDA Protocol on Narrowly Tailored Credit Events

    FCA published an update to its initial joint statement with the U.S. SEC and CFTC on opportunistic strategies in the credit derivatives markets.

    September 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Consultation on Prudent Person Principle Under Solvency II

    PRA, via the consultation paper CP22/19, has set out its proposed expectations for investment by firms, in accordance with the Prudent Person Principle (PPP).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposal on Probability of Default and LGD Estimation

    PRA proposed, via the consultation paper CP21/19, an approach to implementing EBA’s recent regulatory products relating to Probability of Default (PD) estimation, Loss Given Default (LGD) estimation, and the treatment of defaulted exposures in the internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to credit risk.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Formalizes Agreement to Set Up Innovation Hub in Hong Kong SAR

    BIS and HKMA signed the Operational Agreement on the BIS Innovation Hub Center in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (SAR).

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Observations from Thematic Review on Recovery Plans of Insurers

    APRA issued a letter to general insurers and life insurers, outlining observations from a recent thematic review on recovery planning by insurers.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BNM Publishes Financial Stability Review for the First Half of 2019

    BNM published Financial Stability Review for the first half of 2019.

    September 18, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3853