The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that discusses the financial stability implications of the developments in the non-bank financial intermediation sector. The paper lays out a framework for the key channels of systemic risk propagation in the presence of non-bank financial intermediaries, emphasizing the central role of leverage fluctuations through changes in margins. In the framework, deleveraging and "dash for cash" scenarios (as during COVID-19) emerge as two sides of the same coin, rather than being two distinct channels of stress propagation. These findings have implications for the design of non-bank financial intermediary regulations and of central bank backstops.
The paper begins by offering a high-level overview of the increasing footprint of non-bank financial intermediaries in the financial system and looks at selected factors behind their growth. Next, it 2 highlights that systemic risk in non-bank financial intermediary activities often stems from their liability structure—chiefly the use of leverage together with their role in liquidity/maturity transformation. It also describes the mapping between non-bank financial intermediary activities and sources of systemic risk, focusing in particular on those intermediaries that can give rise to substantial liquidity demand during times of market turmoil. Then, it lays out the conceptual framework that formalizes the key channels of systemic risk propagation in market-based intermediation involving non-bank financial intermediaries and uses examples from March 2020 to showcase the key elements of the framework empirically, before finally summarizing key policy and implications and conclusions.
The paper notes that the greater footprint of non-bank financial intermediaries raises the importance of regulations. A key implication of taking a broad-based perspective is that containing solvency risk and addressing investor protection is not sufficient by itself to contain systemic risk. A pure solvency-based perspective is of limited use, since it ignores the externalities and feedback effects that underpin system risk. This calls for a macro-prudential approach toward non-bank financial intermediation regulation. In the new market intermediation ecosystem, margin requirements take on a pivotal role for the propagation of financial conditions through fluctuations in leverage. The paper also finds that the prominent role of the non-bank financial intermediaries has brought benefits by diversifying funding sources, but it has also exacerbated some liquidity imbalances that can, in extreme cases, endanger financial stability. The framework presented in this paper implies that sharp increases in margins, especially after a protracted period of thin margins, will tighten financial conditions for the system as a whole. It also points to a tight link between deleveraging and "dash for cash," as during the COVID-19 pandemic. The systemic relevance of non-bank financial intermediaries raises questions about the appropriate policy strategies. In particular, there is an important correspondence between access to public resources and oversight.
Keywords: International, Banking, NBFI, Liquidity Risk, Systemic Risk, Financial Stability, BIS
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
The UK authorities have published consultations with respect to the Basel requirements for banks. The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the consultation paper CP16/22 on rules for the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards.
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) and the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published a joint report that outlines the initial findings from climate scenario analyses undertaken by financial authorities to assess climate-related financial risks.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a letter intended for the G20 leaders, highlighting the work that it will undertake under the Indian G20 Presidency in 2023 to strengthen resilience of the financial system.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The European Union has finalized and published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a set of 13 Delegated and Implementing Regulations applicable to the European crowdfunding service providers.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.