NCUA Board is proposing to amend the derivatives rule for credit unions. The proposal is intended to modernize the derivatives rule and make it more principles-based. The proposal retains key safety and soundness components, while providing more flexibility for federal credit unions to manage their interest rate risk through the use of derivatives. The changes included in this proposal would streamline the regulation and expand credit unions' authority to purchase and use derivatives for the purpose of managing interest rate risk. The proposal also reorganizes rule content related to loan pipeline management into one section, which will aid in readability and clarity. Comments must be received by December 28, 2020.
The Board is proposing to make numerous changes to the derivatives rule, both substantive and technical. The proposed changes make the derivatives rule less prescriptive and more principles-based. Significant elements of this proposal include eliminating the pre-approval process for federal credit unions that are complex with a Management CAMEL component rating of 1 or 2, eliminating the specific product permissibility, and eliminating the regulatory limits on the amount of derivatives an federal credit union may purchase.
Given the observable safe and effective management of derivatives by credit unions since the 2014 final rule, the Board believes it is appropriate to modernize the derivatives rule to expand the derivatives authority for federal credit unions and shift the regulation toward a more principles-based approach. In developing this proposed rule, the Board carefully considered the risks derivatives pose, contemporary developments in the marketplace, and the experiences of NCUA with credit unions using derivatives. While using derivatives to manage interest rate risk, the Board reminds credit unions that derivatives are not a panacea for managing market risks. Derivatives, when used responsibly, are only a part of the interest rate risk framework of a credit union. Credit unions will still require appropriate risk management by experienced staff, along with suitable policies, procedures, and management oversight.
The Board remains committed to the principle that any authorized derivative activity should be limited to the purpose of mitigating interest rate risk within a discreet hedging strategy and may not be used to increase risks deliberately or conduct any otherwise speculative transactions. The proposal continues to authorize derivative activity by federal credit unions that demonstrate risk characteristics highly correlated to the assets and liabilities of federal credit union, such that derivatives would be an efficient and effective risk mitigation tool. For these reasons, the Board is proposing to amend the derivatives rule. The Board believes these changes will provide regulatory relief in a safe and sound manner for credit unions choosing to utilize derivatives as part of their interest rate risk mitigation strategy.
Related Link: Federal Register Notice
Comment Due Date: December 28, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Derivatives, Interest Rate Risk, Derivatives Rule, NCUA
Previous ArticleEBA Proposes to Revise Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.