NCUA Board is proposing to amend the derivatives rule for credit unions. The proposal is intended to modernize the derivatives rule and make it more principles-based. The proposal retains key safety and soundness components, while providing more flexibility for federal credit unions to manage their interest rate risk through the use of derivatives. The changes included in this proposal would streamline the regulation and expand credit unions' authority to purchase and use derivatives for the purpose of managing interest rate risk. The proposal also reorganizes rule content related to loan pipeline management into one section, which will aid in readability and clarity. Comments must be received by December 28, 2020.
The Board is proposing to make numerous changes to the derivatives rule, both substantive and technical. The proposed changes make the derivatives rule less prescriptive and more principles-based. Significant elements of this proposal include eliminating the pre-approval process for federal credit unions that are complex with a Management CAMEL component rating of 1 or 2, eliminating the specific product permissibility, and eliminating the regulatory limits on the amount of derivatives an federal credit union may purchase.
Given the observable safe and effective management of derivatives by credit unions since the 2014 final rule, the Board believes it is appropriate to modernize the derivatives rule to expand the derivatives authority for federal credit unions and shift the regulation toward a more principles-based approach. In developing this proposed rule, the Board carefully considered the risks derivatives pose, contemporary developments in the marketplace, and the experiences of NCUA with credit unions using derivatives. While using derivatives to manage interest rate risk, the Board reminds credit unions that derivatives are not a panacea for managing market risks. Derivatives, when used responsibly, are only a part of the interest rate risk framework of a credit union. Credit unions will still require appropriate risk management by experienced staff, along with suitable policies, procedures, and management oversight.
The Board remains committed to the principle that any authorized derivative activity should be limited to the purpose of mitigating interest rate risk within a discreet hedging strategy and may not be used to increase risks deliberately or conduct any otherwise speculative transactions. The proposal continues to authorize derivative activity by federal credit unions that demonstrate risk characteristics highly correlated to the assets and liabilities of federal credit union, such that derivatives would be an efficient and effective risk mitigation tool. For these reasons, the Board is proposing to amend the derivatives rule. The Board believes these changes will provide regulatory relief in a safe and sound manner for credit unions choosing to utilize derivatives as part of their interest rate risk mitigation strategy.
Related Link: Federal Register Notice
Comment Due Date: December 28, 2020
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Derivatives, Interest Rate Risk, Derivatives Rule, NCUA
Previous ArticleEBA Proposes to Revise Guidelines on Sound Remuneration Policies
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.