IASB Discusses Application of IFRS 9 Disclosures Amid COVID-19 Crisis
IASB published an article, by Mary Tokar and Sid Kumar, that discusses the potential key financial reporting considerations for preparers, auditors, investors, and regulators as they tackle the complexities associated with the COVID-19 crisis. The discussion draws on views shared during a panel discussion at the IFRS Foundation Virtual Conference on September 28, 2020. The focus is on what information entities should consider when developing assumptions in preparing financial statements in times of heightened uncertainty and what information to disclose about the assumptions used. Most attendees at the conference agreed that disclosure requirements in IFRS standards are satisfactory but improvements are needed in their application.
During the panel discussion, the attendees were polled and asked about a financial reporting issue that was the most challenging in this period of uncertainty. The respondents identified reporting of impairment of financial assets and disclosure of significant judgments as the most challenging tasks. IASB received numerous questions on the application of IFRS 9 on financial instruments during the pandemic. In response to these questions, in March 2020, educational material was published reiterating the requirements in IFRS 9 on the expected credit losses (ECL) model. The educational material emphasized that entities should use all reasonable and supportable information that is available to an entity without undue cost or effort when applying IFRS 9, instead of relying on some mechanistic criterion to determine movements in ECL. In addition, the panel discussed disclosure requirements about assumptions and estimates for both annual and interim financial statements. For entities that report at the end of the calendar year, the impact of COVID-19 was first a reporting issue in their interim financial statement.
The panel also discussed the importance of better information about significant assumptions taking the example of ECL in IFRS 9. An ECL approach requires lenders such as banks to use forward-looking, macro-economic assumptions as inputs in models. These assumptions may be classified as general assumptions by some stakeholders because they may relate to factors outside the control of a bank. In contrast, entity-specific assumptions relate to an entity’s actions and characteristics. When two similar banks use similar general assumptions and arrive at different ECL balances relative to their gross loan books, users want additional information so they can assess the differences in the coverage ratios. For each bank, users want information that helps them understand the extent to which each ECL balance is driven by general assumptions or by entity-specific assumptions that may reflect differences in customer characteristics, loan products, collateral, or other loan terms. Without this information, users find it challenging to make meaningful comparisons. The requirements in IFRS 7 on disclosures related to financial instruments were developed considering user needs and IFRS 7 requires entities to explain the factors that affect measurement of their ECLs.
Keywords: International, Banking, COVID-19, IFRS 9, IFRS 7, ECL, Financial Instruments, Disclosures, Financial Reporting, IASB
CECL, IFRS 9, and IFRS 17 expert; credit risk and insurance risk specialist; strategic planning and credit analytics solutions consultant
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
CECL adoption expert; engagement manager for loss estimation, internal risk capability enhancement, and counterparty credit risk management
Previous ArticleDNB Publishes Several Reporting Updates for Banks in November 2020
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.