OFR introduced two new monitoring tools, the Financial System Vulnerabilities Monitor (FSVM) and the Financial Stress Index (FSI). FSVM and FSI, which are part of the quantitative monitoring toolkit of OFR, signal where the OFR needs to investigate potential stresses and vulnerabilities. OFR conducts such investigations using a broader set of data, qualitative information, and expert analysis.
The OFR FSI is a daily market-based snapshot of stress in global financial markets. It is constructed from 33 financial market variables, such as yield spreads, valuation measures, and interest rates. The FSI is positive when stress levels are above average and negative when stress levels are below average. The FSI incorporates five categories of indicators: credit, equity valuation, funding, safe assets, and volatility. The FSI shows stress contributions by three regions: United States, other advanced economies, and emerging markets.
The OFR FSVM is a starting point for monitoring the U.S. financial stability. It is a heat map of 58 indicators of potential vulnerabilities in the U.S. financial system, organized into six categories: macroeconomic, market, credit, solvency and leverage, funding and liquidity, and contagion. The monitor is designed to provide early warning signals of potential U.S. financial system vulnerabilities that merit investigation. It does not provide conclusions about financial stability. OFR, however, provides such conclusions in its Financial Stability Report and Annual Report. The monitor improves upon and replaces the OFR Financial Stability Monitor.
Keywords: Americas, US, Monitoring Tools, FSVM, FSI, Financial Stability, OFR
Previous ArticleDanièle Nouy of ECB on Role of Banking Supervision in NPL Resolution
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).