Featured Product

    IMF Publishes Reports and Technical Note Under FSAP with Thailand

    October 24, 2019

    IMF published two reports and a technical note as part of the financial sector assessment in Thailand, under the IMF Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP). The technical note covers the risk assessment in the financial sector while the two reports address the detailed assessment of observance on the Basel Core Principles for Effective Banking Supervision (BCPs) and Insurance Core Principals (ICPs) in Thailand. Overall, the system in the country has been found to be generally compliant or largely compliant with BCPs and observant or largely observant on most ICPs.

    The report on detailed assessment of observance of BCPs highlights that there have been significant enhancements to the legal framework and the supervisory process since the last BCP review, resulting in high compliance. Out of the 29 BCPs, Thailand was assessed compliant with 25 principles and largely compliant with four principles. The assessment was performed from October 25 through November 16, 2018 and is based on the regulatory and supervisory framework in place. The Thai authorities welcomed certain recommendations, which included enhancing clarity of internal guidelines for preventive actions and Prompt Preventive/Corrective Action and revising regulation on asset classification, which is to be implemented in 2020 once IFRS 9 becomes effective. The asset classification and provisioning regulation falls short of international good practice in some areas, but the impact is limited and a revised regulation that complies with the international good practice will come into effect soon. The revised regulation of BOT, which addresses the observed gaps, will be implemented once IFRS 9 becomes effective in 2020. This will also bring the Thai accounting standards for financial instruments fully in line with IFRS.

    The report on detailed assessment of observance of ICPs provides an assessment of significant regulatory and supervisory practices in the insurance sector in Thailand. The current assessment is benchmarked against the ICPs issued by IAIS in October 2011, including revisions authorized up until December 2017. Out of the 26 ICPs, 10 ICPs were observed, 12 were largely observed, and four were partially observed. The ICPs that were partly observed are those on licensing, suitability of persons, changes in control and portfolio transfers, and cross-border cooperation and coordination on crisis management. The key recommendations in the report are intended to improve supervision follow for consideration by the Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) and, where applicable, by other involved government agencies whose approval would also be necessary. The recommendations highlight that risk-based capital should include a provision for all relevant material risks. Moreover, supervisory measures regarding cross-border crisis management should be objectively applied based on stated criteria while the licensing, suitability, and control requirements should be reviewed and strengthened.

    The technical note on risk assessment concludes that the resilience of the banking system in Thailand was assessed under a battery of stress tests performed by the FSAP. The solvency stress test indicates that the largest banks can withstand an adverse scenario broadly as severe as the Asian financial crisis. Banks also appear to be resilient to sizable withdrawals of liquidity, though some would face increased funding pressures. The liquidity stress test on investment funds showed that they would be able to withstand a severe redemption shock and the impact on the banks and the bond market would be limited. An analysis of the interconnectedness and contagion in the banking sector and in the financial system at large did not find any particular vulnerabilities. BOT has continued to improve its stress testing framework since its first top-down solvency macro stress test in 2017. While BOT has a wide range of well-structured data, there is room for improvement, particularly on the time series of Internal Ratings-Based banks’ Probability of Defaults and Loss Given Default and data management for liquidity risk to ensure the availability of more granular data, including a finer breakdown by type.


    Related Links

    Keywords: Asia Pacific, Thailand, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Basel Core Principles, ICP, Stress Testing, LCR, IAIS, BOT, IMF

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Penalizes Heritage Bank for Incorrect Reporting of Capital

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Releases Annual Report 2021-2022

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Capital Adequacy Standards for Banks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CPMI-IOSCO Seek Comments on Access to Central Clearing and Portability

    The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.

    November 29, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Guidance on Management of Climate Change Risks

    The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.

    November 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Single Rulebook Q&A Updates in November 2021

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.

    November 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Finalizes Rules on Internal Approaches Benchmarking Exercise

    The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.

    November 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Proposes New Measures Under Capital Markets Union Package

    The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    European Council Adopts Position on Digital Finance Package Proposals

    The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Rulebook Changes; BoE Extends BEEDS Testing Window

    The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.

    November 25, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 7740