Featured Product

    BoE Paper Examines Linguistic Complexity in Banking Regulations

    October 24, 2019

    BoE published a paper that discusses a study on the textual complexity of banking regulations post the financial crisis of 2007-08. The authors have attempted to interpret regulatory complexity in terms of processing complexity by using techniques from natural language processing, or NLP, and network analysis and applying these techniques to the new post-crisis international banking rules. The results of the study suggest that the linguistic complexity in banking regulation is concentrated in a relatively small number of provisions and the post-crisis reforms have accentuated this feature.

    The paper covers the ultimate normative question: “How complex does bank regulation have to be?” However, before this, there is another question: “How complex is bank regulation?” This study provides evidence to help answer this question by calculating textual complexity indicators on the near universe of UK prudential rules. The dataset used for this study captures legal sources comprehensively, allows like-for-like comparison between the post- and pre-crisis frameworks, and captures the entire structure of cross-references within the regulatory framework (to facilitate network analysis). The dataset included the near universe of prudential legal obligations and supervisory guidance that applied to UK banks in 2007 and 2017. It captured changes in both the scope of what regulators seek to control and in the legal architecture.

    In this paper, the authors define complexity in terms of the processing difficulty encountered when comprehending a particular linguistic unit—for example, a single regulatory provision. Dimensions of processing difficulty for a provision include its length, lexical diversity, use of conditional statements, and the overall readability of its sentences (defined as “local” complexity). Some processing difficulties can only be resolved after accessing information outside the immediate context of the provision—for instance, cross-references or regulatory precedents needed to understand a provision’s intent (“global” complexity). The authors use natural language processing and network analysis techniques to measure these dimensions of local and global complexity and apply these measures to the constructed dataset.

    The study found that linguistic complexity in banking regulation is concentrated in a relatively small number of provisions. Starting from the simplest provisions, the measures of complexity increase slowly, but then pick up rapidly as the study approaches the last 10% of most complex provisions. This stylized fact has been accentuated by the post-crisis reforms, which have resulted in the rise of highly complex provisions, in particular a tightly connected core. The authors recognize that more benchmarking for these indicators is a necessary next step toward answering the question on how complex does bank regulation have to be. Benchmarking against non-financial regulatory frameworks, or frameworks in other jurisdictions, is challenging given differences in legal systems and policy substance. However, authors plan to exploit variation within the used dataset to compare changes in complexity measures for different policy standards and test how they correspond to the expectations of policymakers.

    The authors stress that these measures do not exhaust all the dimensions of linguistic complexity—in particular, resolving ambiguity in regulation is very likely to be important for information burden. In addition, to understand the economic effect of regulatory complexity “soft” textual information needs to be combined with traditional “hard” numeric data. For example, textual regulatory complexity could be compared to balance sheet complexity. Eventually, natural language processing can help enrich the economic evaluation of rules in terms of the interaction between rules, the impact of linguistic complexity, and the effectiveness of “rules vs standards.” The study contributes to this long-term research agenda, by creating a dataset of all provisions for UK banks and analyzing how they have changed with post-crisis reforms. 

     

    Related Link: Staff Working Paper

    Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, NLP, Machine Learning, Machine-Readable Regulations, Artificial Intelligence, Regtech, BoE

    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Publishes Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published the Hong Kong Taxonomy for Sustainable Finance.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Taking Steps to Set Out and Enforce AI Regulations

    Many believe that the transformative power of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has potential to reshape the financial sector in the time to come.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ISSB Releases Digital Sustainability Disclosures Taxonomy

    The themes of the harmonization and interoperability of sustainability disclosure standards among various jurisdictions remain at the top-of-mind for international standard-setting bodies.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Report Studies Implications of Digitalization of Finance

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published a report that examines the implications of the digitalization of finance for banks and supervisors.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Guidelines for Counterparty Credit Risk Management

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is seeking comments, until August 28, 2024, on guidelines for counterparty credit risk management of banks.

    May 21, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BIS Paper Outlines Vision for Future Financial System

    In a recent paper, the General Manager of Bank for International Settlements (BIS) and the Indian entrepreneur (Infosys co-founder) Nandan Nilekani have laid out a vision for the Finternet, which is proposed to be a network of multiple financial ecosystems, much like the internet.

    April 29, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NGFS Outlines Options for Supervisory Review of Transition Plans

    The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) recently published three reports on the use of transition plans to boost sustainable finance and manage climate-related financial risks.

    April 29, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Issues Discussion Paper on Climate Scenario Analysis

    The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued a discussion paper on the use of climate scenario analysis to strengthen the management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.

    April 29, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    OSFI Issues Phase2 Consultation on Climate Scenario Exercise for Banks

    The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) recently announced a consultation on the second phase of the Standardized Climate Scenario Exercise (SCSE) for banks and other financial institutions it regulates in Canada.

    April 25, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFIT to Chair Open Finance Taskforce Announced by UK Government

    The UK government announced the formation of an industry-led Open Finance Taskforce, chaired by the Center for Finance, Innovation, and Technology (CFIT).

    April 25, 2024 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8967