During its October meeting, IASB discussed the feedback it received from stakeholders about the new insurance contracts standard, IFRS 17. This feedback has allowed IASB and its technical staff to better understand concerns about the implementation of IFRS 17 and whether further steps, including possible standard-setting, are required.
IASB has previously stated that it will respond to implementation challenges, if required. In the October meeting, IASB considered whether to respond to the feedback received but was not asked by staff to make decisions about whether to propose any changes to the standard. At this meeting, IASB agreed on the criteria it will use in evaluating potential changes to IFRS 17, namely that any changes should not result in less useful information for investors, disrupt existing implementation processes, and risk undue delays in the effective date of a much-needed standard, which can address inadequacies in the current wide range of insurance accounting practices.
IASB will discuss further whether there is a need to propose changes to IFRS 17 in the coming months. It is too early to say whether these discussions will result in any proposals to change the standard. If any changes were to be proposed, IASB will follow its normal due process for standard-setting, which includes a public consultation.
Keywords: International, Accounting, Insurance, IFRS 17, Insurance Contracts, Implementation Supports, IASB
Previous ArticleESMA Advised on Steps to Contain Risks of ICOs and Crypto Assets
EC published Regulation 2021/25 that addresses amendments related to the financial reporting consequences of replacement of the existing interest rate benchmarks with alternative reference rates.
BIS published a bulletin, or a note, that examines the cyber threat landscape in the context of the pandemic and discusses policies to reduce risks to financial stability.
HM Treasury, also known as HMT, has updated the table containing the list of the equivalence decisions that came into effect in UK at the end of the transition period of its withdrawal from EU.
EBA published an erratum for technical package on phase 1 of the reporting framework 3.0.
APRA updated a frequently asked question (FAQ), for authorized deposit-taking institutions, on the measurement of credit risk weighted assets.
EBA published the quarterly risk dashboard, along with the results of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire survey among 60 banks and 15 market analysts.
ECB concluded the public consultation on the introduction of a digital euro in EU.
ECB published a guide that sets out the supervisory approach to consolidation in the banking sector.
The SRB Chair Elke König published an article setting out work priorities for 2021.
FDIC has selected 11 technology companies—including BearingPoint, Fed Reporter, Inc, and S&P Global Market Intelligence, LLC—for inclusion in the third and final phase of the rapid prototyping competition.