Featured Product

    EBA Opinion on Regulatory Treatment of NPE Securitizations

    October 23, 2019

    EBA published an opinion on the regulatory treatment of securitizations of non-performing exposures (NPEs). Securitizations can play an instrumental role in reducing NPE stocks in the balance sheets of credit institutions but such a role may be hindered by certain provisions in the EU securitization framework. The opinion recommends various amendments to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and to the Securitization Regulation to remove the identified constraints. The opinion is addressed to EC and contributes to the objectives of the action plan of the European Council to tackle non-performing loans in Europe.

    The opinion explains that the regulatory framework imposes certain constraints on credit institutions using securitizations to dispose off NPE holdings. The constraints include: 

    • Very high capital requirements on investor credit institutions under CRR. The pre-eminent securitization capital methods (the SEC-IRBA and the SEC-SA) and the look-through approach lead to disproportionately high capital charges on NPE securitization positions when compared to the relevant benchmarks and, as a result, tend to overstate the actual risk embedded in the portfolio.
    • Compliance challenges for certain risk retention and due diligence requirements under the Securitization Regulation.

    The opinion, therefore, recommends that EC should consider a number of targeted amendments to CRR and the Securitization Regulation to remove these constraints while maintaining the integrity of the prudential framework. EBA also recommends EC to take action to clarify where the caps for securitizations laid down in Articles 267 and 268 of the CRR are applied to NPE securitizations. Furthermore, the potential amendments to CRR should be, to the extent possible, consistent with the comparable international standards. NPE securitizations are transactions backed by pools comprised exclusively, or almost exclusively, of NPEs at the time of inception. Though structurally similar to other securitizations, the underlying assets have distinctive features that set NPE securitizations apart from those from an economic substance perspective, namely due to the large discount on their nominal value and their specific underlying risks. 

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securitization, Credit Risk, NPL, Opinion, CRR, Securitization Regulation, Non-Performing Exposures, EC, EBA

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Finalizes Reporting Standard for Operational Risk Requirements

    APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.

    March 03, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Publishes Guide for Determining Penalties for Regulatory Breaches

    ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.

    March 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Sets Out Good Practices to Manage Operational Risks Amid COVID

    MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

    March 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ACPR Announces New Data Collection Application for Banks and Insurers

    ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.

    March 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCB Maintains CCyB at 0%, Initiates First Cycle of Regulatory Sandbox

    BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.

    March 02, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Consults on Pillar 3 Disclosure Standards for ESG Risks Under CRR

    EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

    March 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting

    ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting

    March 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Launches Study on Non-Life Underwriting Risk in Internal Models

    EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.

    March 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    SRB Publishes Overview of Resolution Tools Available in Banking Union

    SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.

    March 01, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EU Amends CRD4 and CRD5 as Part of Capital Markets Recovery Package

    EU published Directive 2021/338, which amends the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and the Capital Requirements Directives (CRD 4 and 5) to facilitate recovery from the COVID-19 crisis.

    February 26, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6650