Ambassadors of EU member states agreed on the mandate of European Council on the Capital Markets Recovery Package, to support economic recovery from the COVID-19 crisis. The amendments in the package focus on the the securitization framework as laid down in the Securitization Regulation and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), the Markets in financial instruments directive (MiFID) II, and the Prospectus Regulation. European Council lends full political support to the EC package, while suggesting changes to some of the detailed provisions.
With respect to securitizations, the proposed amendments extend the existing EU framework for simple, transparent, and standardized (STS) securitizations to synthetic securitizations. Synthetic securitizations are an important credit risk management tool for banks, as they enable banks to transfer the credit risk of a set of loans, typically large corporate loans or small and medium-size enterprise (SME) loans, to investors. In addition, regulatory obstacles to the securitization of non-performing exposures are removed to support banks in offloading non-performing exposures from their balance sheets in the context of the COVID-19 crisis, while maintaining high prudential standards.
European Council suggests complementing the EC proposals with a dedicated prudential treatment for synthetic excess spread (SES) in the CRR. SES is a credit enhancement tool and a common feature in synthetic securitization transactions; however, this tool could be misused for regulatory arbitrage. The introduction of dedicated and comprehensive regulatory capital requirements for SES addresses the risk of a potential misuse of SES for arbitrage purposes for all synthetic securitization transactions, irrespective of whether they meet the STS criteria or not. On the basis of this mandate, the presidency will start negotiations with the European Parliament as soon as the Parliament has adopted its position.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, COVID-19, CRR, Basel, Securitization, Securitization Regulation, STS Securitization, Capital Markets Union, Credit Risk, NPE, EC, European Council
Previous ArticleEBA Issues Opinion to Address Risk Stemming from Legacy Instruments
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.