SEC reopened comment period and/or requested additional comments on proposals related to various requirements for Security-Based Swap Dealers (SBSDs), Major Security-Based Swap Participants (MSBSPs), and broker-dealers. Comments should be submitted by November 19, 2018.
SEC is requesting additional comment on the proposed amendment that would establish an additional capital requirement for SBSDs that do not have a prudential regulator. In addition, SEC reopened the comment period and requested additional comment (including potential modifications to proposed rule language) on the proposed amendments and new rules that would:
- Establish capital, margin, and segregation requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs that do not have a prudential regulator
- Raise minimum net capital requirements and establish liquidity requirements for broker-dealers that are permitted to use internal models when computing net capital (ANC broker-dealers)
- Establish the cross-border treatment of security-based swap capital, margin, and segregation requirements
Earlier, in October 2012, SEC had proposed amendments and new rules to establish capital and margin requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs that do not have a prudential regulator, segregation requirements for SBSDs, and establish notification requirements for SBSDs and MSBSPs relating to segregation, in addition to raising the minimum net capital requirements and establishing liquidity requirements for broker-dealers permitted to use internal models when computing net capital. SEC has extended the comment period once, in addition to reopening it once. Moreover, in May 2013, SEC had proposed provisions to establish the cross-border treatment of security-based swap capital, margin, and segregation requirements. SEC received a number of comment letters in response to the 2012 and 2013 Proposals. Finally, in April 2014, SEC proposed an additional non-bank SBSD capital requirement. SEC received one comment letter in response to the 2014 proposal.
Since publication of the 2012 Proposals, SEC has adopted other rules related to the regulation of the over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets pursuant to Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act. In addition, the prudential regulators and CFTC have adopted or proposed rules under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act that are relevant to the Proposals. SEC has carefully considered the comment letters and SEC believes it is prudent to reopen the comment period for the Proposals in light of these comments and regulatory developments. SEC believes the public should have the opportunity to provide comment on the potential economic effects of the Proposals in light of regulatory and market developments since they were published. SEC is also seeking comments on certain aspects of the Proposals for which further information would be particularly helpful to SEC. In particular, SEC is seeking comment on potential rule language that would modify rule text that was in the Proposals. Comment letters received by SEC previously need not be re-submitted, as they will continue to be a part of the public comment file for this rulemaking and considered by SEC.
Comment Due Date: November 19, 2018
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Securities, Security-based Swaps, Swap Dealers, Swap Participants, Cross-border Treatment, Capital Requirements, Dodd Frank Act, SEC
Previous ArticleBDF Updates A Supporting Document for AnaCredit Reporting
Next ArticleUS Agencies Publish Semi-Annual Regulatory Agenda
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
ECB finalized guidance on the way it expects banks to prudently manage and transparently disclose climate and other environmental risks under the current prudential rules.
BCBS published a technical amendment to the capital treatment of securitizations of non-performing loans by banks.
BoE announced that the Data and Statistics Division is planning to move collection of statistical data to the BoE Electronic Data Submission (BEEDS) portal.
APRA published the updated reporting standards and guidance for the collection of Economic and Financial Statistics (EFS), following a consultation process. Also published was a response letter to the feedback received on the proposal for amending the EFS reporting standards and guidance.
EC is consulting on a draft delegated regulation to supplement the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable.
The IFRS Foundation published material highlighting the ways in which existing requirements in IFRS standards require companies to consider climate-related matters when their effect is material to the financial statements.
FSB published a progress report on the implementation of reforms to major interest rate benchmarks, including the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark.