During his keynote speech at the Banco de Espana in Madrid, ESMA Chair Steven Maijoor discussed the implementation and enforcement of IFRS 9 standard from the perspective of securities markets regulators. He addressed three issues related to the expected credit loss (ECL) model: quantitative impact of IFRS 9; transparency and understandability of the ECL model by investors; and role of auditors and supervisory cooperation.
In its annual European Common Enforcement Priorities for 2018 year-end, ESMA focuses on some of the application issues of IFRS 9. The focus will be on the need for transparency and disclosures on the assumptions of ECL models and on the key judgments made. Based on the average reported quantitative impact in the financial statements, the introduction of IFRS 9 as of January 01, 2018 had, in most countries, a lower quantitative impact than originally expected. However, the widely reported headline figure of the impact on regulatory capital across the industry might not give the entire picture. Given the complexity of modeling and the role of judgment in determining some of the assumptions used in the ECL calculation, it cannot be excluded that new inconsistencies in the implementation of the provisioning are arising in practice.
He then highlighted that multiple scenarios need to be reflected in the ECL modeling, given the non-linear nature of credit losses in response to a deteriorating economic outlook. In this context, he discussed that the last report of the Joint Committee of ESAs on risk and vulnerabilities in the EU financial system identifies repricing of risk premia and potential increase of interest rates as key factors that could negatively affect financial institutions. Thus, it is important that all relevant risks identified are reflected in ECL models. While discussing the transparency and understandability of the ECL model, he highlighted the importance of disclosing material assumptions and judgments made in estimating ECL and emphasized that banks should disclose their approach to setting the criteria for identifying the significant increase in credit risk for material portfolios. He also mentioned that banks should explain how they are taking into account forward-looking information in determining the ECL and that there is a need to disclose information on the multiple scenarios capturing the non-linear nature of the credit losses under the downturn scenario.
He commented on the scope of the involvement of auditors and supervisors in assessing the ECL model and emphasized the need for close cooperation between supervisors in assessing the implementation of IFRS 9, as highlighted in the 2017 report of ESRB. Supervisors need to step up their efforts in capacity building and gain experience in assessing ECL models. The new ECL model poses challenges for both banking supervisors and accounting enforcers within their respective remits. Accounting enforcers are developing their expertise to scrutinize more complex ECL models used in the financial statements. He believes that communication, cooperation, exchange of information as well as practical experience between accounting enforcers and banking supervisors need to be further reinforced to reflect the increased complexity of the ECL models. This is essential to ensure high quality, consistent implementation of IFRS 9.
Related Link: Speech (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Accounting, Banking, Securities, IFRS 9, Expected Credit Loss, Credit Risk, Disclosures, ESMA
Next ArticleFSB Publishes the G-SIB List for 2018
HKMA announced the publication of a report on fintech adoption and innovation in the banking industry in Hong Kong.
BIS published a working paper that examines the drivers of cyber risk, especially in context of the cloud services.
ECB launched consultation on a guide specifying how the Banking Supervision expects banks to consider climate-related and environmental risks in their governance and risk management frameworks and when formulating and implementing their business strategy.
ECB published an opinion (CON/2020/16) on amendments to the prudential framework in EU in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
EBA published a report that examines the interlinkages between recovery and resolution planning under the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD).
SRB published the final Minimum Requirements for Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (MREL) policy under the Banking Package.
ECB published results of the March 2020 survey on credit terms and conditions in euro-denominated securities financing and over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives markets.
FINMA published guidance (06/2020) on extending or discontinuing various exemptions that were granted due to the COVID-19 crisis.
SRB launched a consultation on the minimum data needed for valuation of a bank in resolution.
EIOPA announced a change in the frequency of current extraordinary processes for risk-free interest rate term structures (RFR) and symmetric adjustment to equity risk (EDA) from a weekly basis to every two weeks.