Featured Product

    FSI Reports Findings of Crisis Simulation Exercise in Latin America

    October 18, 2021

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlement (BIS) published a report presenting findings of the March 2021 cross-border crisis simulation exercise aimed to test financial crisis management arrangements. The exercise involved 11 central banks, supervisory authorities, and deposit insurers from Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Paraguay, and Uruguay in an invented scenario based on the failure of a fictional regionally systemic cross-border banking group. The report presents general findings and recommendations on crisis management tools, recovery and resolution planning, liquidity and resolution funding, domestic decision-making procedures, and cross-border cooperation and information-sharing.

    The crisis simulation exercise was intended to enable participating authorities to practice and test the existing crisis management and cooperation frameworks. The simulation was based on a fictional scenario, designed to trigger discussion and decision-making within each country and across borders. The scenario design introduced a significant degree of complexity and uncertainty, including gaps in information. The setup also aimed to foster a collaborative environment in which participants could share experiences and lessons learned. The findings of the exercise covered the tools and procedures under national frameworks and the functioning of domestic and cross-border cooperation arrangements. Participants managed the simulated crisis well, performing the necessary analysis, developing strategies, and preparing and implementing decisions while fostering a constructive exchange among participating authorities. Nevertheless, the exercise revealed certain challenges in the development of solutions within existing funding restrictions that involve burden-sharing between domestic sources and across borders. 

    The analysis indicates that a crisis management protocol with detailed guidance on early intervention tools can facilitate decision-making. A playbook of possible actions organized in accordance with crisis severity would provide authorities with guidance about use of the crisis toolkit. Most authorities had procedures to follow once resolution was imminent. However, identifying actions for a given crisis severity in advance, combined with supervisory judgment, may allow authorities to place ailing institutions on a spectrum of increasing stress and to respond appropriately at each stage. Such crisis management protocol could include the following supervisory actions:

    • Interaction with supervised entities. During business as usual, supervisors typically interact with banks in accordance with a risk-based and procedurally oriented protocol that defines the scope and frequency of meetings, data deliveries and on- and off-site examinations following a schedule set on a yearly basis. As stress increases, such schedule may no longer be adequate since the intensity of interactions may need to be stepped up significantly. A protocol can be helpful to structure such interaction for authorities and banks. Based on qualitative triggers, this could guide an increase in the scope and frequency of information and data requirements, increased interactions with senior management, and the use of “moral suasion” to encourage corrective action by a bank. Where deemed meaningful, quantitative triggers can also help guide action tailored to the appropriate crisis severity point.
    • Response to activation of a recovery plan. Typical recovery options include strengthening the bank’s capital base through equity injections by existing or new shareholders, disposal of business lines or assets, and mobilization of collateral. As most of these actions may have side effects, supervisors’ protocols should also consider whether specific recovery options may have implications for the preferred resolution strategy for the bank(s). Furthermore, supervisors need to be clear about the timing of a bank’s recovery measures. For example, action to raise additional capital might fail if taken too late as the crisis intensifies.
    • Assessment of situation of a bank. This could include, for example, measures such as asset quality reviews, stress tests or on- and off-site inspections, which might be used to challenge a bank’s assessment of its recovery measures, remove uncertainties in the balance sheet, and/or protect or restore market confidence.


    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Latin America, Crisis Simulation Exercise, Resolution Planning, Cross-Border Framework, Resolution Framework, BIS 

    Related Articles

    EBA Launches Stress Tests for Banks, Issues Other Updates

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) launched the 2023 European Union (EU)-wide stress test, published annual reports on minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and high earners with data as of December 2021.

    January 31, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Proposes Standards for IRRBB Reporting Under Basel Framework

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.

    January 31, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    FED Issues Further Details on Pilot Climate Scenario Analysis Exercise

    The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.

    January 17, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    US Agencies Issue Several Regulatory and Reporting Updates

    The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.

    January 04, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    ECB Issues Multiple Reports and Regulatory Updates for Banks

    The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.

    January 01, 2023 WebPage Regulatory News

    HKMA Keeps List of D-SIBs Unchanged, Makes Other Announcements

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.

    December 30, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EU Issues FAQs on Taxonomy Regulation, Rules Under CRD, FICOD and SFDR

    The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.

    December 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    CBIRC Revises Measures on Corporate Governance Supervision

    The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.

    December 29, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    HKMA Publications Address Sustainability Issues in Financial Sector

    The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.

    December 23, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News

    EBA Updates Address Basel and NPL Requirements for Banks

    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.

    December 22, 2022 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 8700