EC published the first annual report of the International Platform on Sustainable Finance (IPSF). The report provides an overview of the work done over the previous year and outlines the crucial role of sustainable finance in the context of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The IPSF work is focused on developing Common Ground Taxonomy, developing standards and labels for sustainable finance products, and improving climate-related disclosure. The report highlights that significant gaps still exist in the quality and comparability of environmental-related information disclosed by companies. Thus, most IPSF members with regulatory regimes are revising them while those with voluntary-based approaches are considering a shift to hard law.
The report presents an overview of the main characteristics of member jurisdictions' sustainable finance tools in three key focus areas of IPSF: taxonomies, standards and labels, and disclosures. It underlines the main commonalities and divergences in IPSF jurisdictions. Sustainable finance markets have grown massively in volume and in diversity during the last years, but their growth is still far from sufficient to achieve the targets. The report notes that the policy tools on which the IPSF work focuses have the capacity to be very efficient to further scale up sustainable finance:
- The development of green taxonomies within the IPSF membership is nascent, but uptake potential is promising. Many IPSF jurisdictions are considering developing a taxonomy and the potential for comparability in this area is significant. IPSF initiated a working group on taxonomies that will work toward a “Common Ground Taxonomy,” highlighting the commonalities between existing taxonomies. This Common Ground Taxonomy will enhance transparency about what is commonly green in member jurisdictions and contribute to scale up cross-border green investments significantly.
- More and more jurisdictions are developing standards and labels for sustainable financial products, with regulations and guidelines, to provide transparency and clarity and address the risk of greenwashing. IPSF will keep monitoring market developments regarding standards and labels and could envisage the creation of a dedicated working group in the near future.
- In recent years, environmental-related disclosure has improved considerably and a majority of IPSF members have already set mandatory regulatory requirements. Nonetheless, there are still significant gaps notably in the quality and comparability of information disclosed to meet the needs of investors. In this light, most IPSF members with regulatory regimes are revising them while those with voluntary-based approaches are considering a shift to hard law. To ensure that these developments are coordinated and coherent, IPSF is about to launch a working group on corporate environmental-related disclosure. This working group will facilitate the exchange of views and information on national and international policy and regulatory developments regarding environmental-related reporting and will support further alignment of disclosure requirements across IPSF member jurisdictions.
The analysis of this report constitutes the basis for further in-depth work within the IPSF to facilitate comparability and convergence in approaches, in particular the creation of two working groups on taxonomies and disclosure and possibly, in the future on standards and labels. While green financial markets are growing, more work needs to be done to meet environmental objectives, especially to facilitate green recovery following the pandemic. To this end, IPSF created a working group on taxonomies, co-led by the EU and China, to help enhance transparency for investors and facilitate cross-border green investments. The report points out that continued efforts will ensure that jurisdictions continue to develop regulatory tools to better harness the resources of the financial system in the transition to a sustainable future.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Annual Report, COVID-19, Disclosures, Reporting, Taxonomy, IPSF, EC
Previous ArticleBDE Updates Reporting Instructions for Banks in August 2020
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.