Featured Product

    EBA Consults on Guidelines for Application of S-FX Provision Under CRR

    October 16, 2019

    EBA is consulting on the guidelines on application of the structural foreign exchange, or S-FX, provision under Article 352(2) of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines aim to set a regulatory framework on structural foreign exchange to address the observed diversity in its application across EU. The guidelines identify criteria to assist competent authorities in their assessment of the structural nature of a foreign-exchange position and whether such a position has been deliberately taken for hedging the capital ratio. The consultation period ends on January 17, 2020.

    This consultation paper sets out objective criteria that competent authorities should consider for assessing whether the conditions set out in article 352(2) of the CRR for receiving the permission to exclude a foreign-exchange position from the net open position in the foreign currency are met. The guidelines introduce, for the first time, a detailed regulatory framework for the structural foreign-exchange provision and several questions have been included as part of the consultation process to gather feedback on the proposed provisions. The consultation paper:

    • Provides clarifications on the structural foreign-exchange provision, clarifying, among others, that institutions computing the own funds requirements for foreign-exchange risk with the standardized approach and with the internal model approach may apply for the waiver and the waiver should be sought only for currencies that are material for the institution.
    • Discusses the concepts of positions ‘deliberately taken to hedge the capital ratio and positions of "a non-trading or structural nature." EBA proposes that only banking book positions may be subject to the waiver and that the position for which the exemption is sought should be long on a net basis.
    • Sets the governance requirements and the requirements related to the risk-management strategy of the institution with respect to its structural foreign-exchange positions.
    • Clarifies that items held at historical cost should be considered as part of the foreign-exchange open position.
    • Deals with the calculation of the maximum open position that can be excluded from the net open position. In line with the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) standards, the EBA proposes that the exemption should be limited in size by the open position for which the capital ratio is non-sensitive to the exchange rate.
    • Clarifies some aspects with respect to the calculation of the own funds requirements for foreign-exchange risk where some positions have been excluded from the net open position, following the permission of the competent authority.
    • Provides clarifications on the approval process and how competent authorities should react to possible changes in the risk-management strategy of the structural foreign-exchange positions.

    Furthermore, the annexes to the consultation paper further clarify technical details discussed in the paper and provide examples on the application of the structural foreign-exchange provision. The concept and application of the structural foreign-exchange provision, as laid down in the CRR, appears to be subject to several interpretations, across both supervisory authorities and institutions. This is particularly relevant, as over the last few years banks appear to have become increasingly interested in the application of the structural foreign-exchange exclusion. Moreover, the implementation of this provision seems to be quite uneven across jurisdictions and there is a lack of clarity about what constitutes a structural position for the purposes of Article 352(2). Finally, the treatment of the structural foreign-exchange has been modified in the recently published FRTB. Therefore, the application of this provision can have a significant impact on capital requirements. Accordingly, EBA believes that a more harmonized application and enforcement of this provision is necessary and can be achieved with these guidelines.

     

    Related Links

    Comment Due Date: January 17, 2020

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRR, Guidelines, S-FX, Structural Foreign Exchange, FRTB, Market Risk, Regulatory Capital, Basel III

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    Regulators Fine Goldman Sachs for Risk Management Failures

    FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).

    October 23, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Canada Hosts International Conference of Banking Supervisors

    BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.

    October 22, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Proposes More Measures to Help Insurance Customers Amid Crisis

    FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.

    October 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Issues Opinion to Address Risk Stemming from Legacy Instruments

    EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.

    October 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESRB Publishes Non-Bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor for 2020

    ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).

    October 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Policy Statement Amending Benchmarks Regulation

    HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.

    October 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Initiates Action Against a Bank for Liquidity Compliance Breach

    APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.

    October 21, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Consults on Implementation of Certain Provisions of CRD5 and CRR2

    PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).

    October 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Rule to Reduce Impact of Large Bank Failures

    US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    October 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    US Agencies Finalize Rule on Net Stable Funding Ratio Requirements

    US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.

    October 20, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6004