HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period. The government has laid the secondary legislation—entitled "The Financial Holding Companies (Approval etc.) and Capital Requirements (Capital Buffers and Macro-prudential Measures) (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2020"—implementing the relevant CRD5 provisions before Parliament on October 15, 2020, after dialog with BoE, PRA, and FCA as well as after considering feedback to the consultation. The government will implement EU legislation that applies before the end of 2020 and this includes the transposition of CRD5 into the national law by December 28, 2020. The government is expected to publish a consultation in Autumn 2020 toward the implementation of certain provisions discussed in this response.
The government ran a consultation on its proposed approach to implementation of the Capital Requirements Directive 5 (CRD5) from July 16, 2020 to August 20, 2020. This Directive updates the prudential legislative framework that applies to banks and systemic investment firms. The consultation outlined proposals of the government for new requirements on financial holding companies, changes to the macro-prudential toolkit, and the intention to exempt non-systemic investment firms from the scope of CRD5, and sought comments. The government received eight responses from a mixture of industry bodies and financial institutions, including BNY Mellon, Building Society Association, The Investment Association, and UK Finance. The responses broadly highlighted agreement with the proposed approach of the government but noted a few areas that required clarification or highlighted specific complexities. These areas related to the macro-prudential updates and the holding company approval regime. The following are the key highlights of the government response:
- PRA and Financial Policy Committee will be given powers to set an other systemically important institution, or O-SII, buffer, to require ring-fenced banks and large building societies to hold a sufficient level of capital. The legislation will also make necessary updates to the definition of Other and Globally Systemically Important Institutions to reflect changes set out in the Directive. PRA plans to consult on the implementation of these provisions in Autumn of 2020.
- PRA will be given a power over the CRD5 systemic risk buffer and will have the ability to recognize third-country systemic risk buffers. PRA intends to explain its approach to the revised CRD5 systemic risk buffer in its Autumn consultation. FPC and PRA will continue to be able to apply macro-prudential Sectoral Capital Requirements.
- A bespoke holding company approval regime will be created for parent holding companies and other holding companies required to comply with the Capital Requirements Directive or the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) on a consolidated or sub-consolidated basis. The government will legislate to provide PRA with the enforcement powers required to supervise holding companies, as required for transposition of CRD5. Other holding companies that are not the ultimate parent or responsible for sub-consolidated requirements will not be subject to approval.
- PRA will also be given the power to remove members of management boards where an individual is no longer of sufficiently good repute, no longer possesses sufficient knowledge, skills, experience, honesty, integrity, or independence of mind, or is no longer able to commit sufficient time.
- The Senior Managers and Certification Regime, or SMCR, will not be extended as part of the legislation.
Finally, in its response, PRA noted that it does consider climate risks as part of its Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process (SREP) and that its approach to SREP is covered in the supervisory statement SS3/19.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, CRD5 Transposition, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Brexit, SM&CR, CRD5, Responses to Consultation, HM Treasury
Previous ArticleHM Treasury Publishes Response to Proposal on BRRD2 Transposition
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.