Deutsche Bundesbank published the results of its annual financial stability review. The report, which considers developments up to September 30, 2020, focuses on the risks stemming from the coronavirus pandemic and the associated economic shock. The report highlights that reforms implemented after the global financial crisis are paying off: banks are now better capitalized, have additional capital buffers, and can use them more flexibly. In the future, limiting existing vulnerabilities will be one of the main priorities. The analysis reveals that, in the further course of the pandemic, insolvencies in the corporate sector are likely to increase and that policymakers should prepare early to deal with any unfavorable developments.
The coronavirus pandemic and the measures taken to contain it led, in the first half of 2020, to the severest economic downturn for decades, with nearly all sectors of the real economy being affected. Even though the shock did not originate in the financial system—unlike the global financial crisis in 2007-08—its indirect impact there was nonetheless significant. As a result of the pandemic, existing vulnerabilities in the financial system are amplified. Debt in the private and public sectors has risen while low interest rates are encouraging a search for yield and an underestimation of credit risk. Asset prices could drop sharply. In adverse scenarios, there are risks to financial stability that call for adequate preparation. The report points out the possibility of insolvencies and the associated credit defaults rising unexpectedly sharply. This would weigh on capital ratios of banks, encouraging banks to restrict their lending to meet the capital ratios required by the market and by supervisors. Existing capital buffers could go unused and some banks could run into financial distress. In this case, banks should use their existing capital buffers to continue lending, as the buffers were built up in good times as a preventive measure so that they can be used in times of crisis. This scope was created by the supervisory reforms implemented following the global financial crisis.
Given these risks, market participants, policymakers, and supervisors should prepare early on for very unfavorable developments and identify related bottlenecks so that the financial system can fulfil its functions, even in such circumstances. Sufficient capacities and experience in handling insolvencies—both at banks and public authorities—is likely to be of relevance for the future development of the economy. Insolvency proceedings ultimately have the aim of coordinating the different interests of creditors and debtors of distressed enterprises. Precisely because insolvencies were at an all-time low in Germany over the past decade, capacities in the private and public sectors might not be sufficient to deal with the sharply rising numbers of insolvencies. Accordingly, preparations for such an eventuality are needed. Policymakers face the challenge of striking the right balance: on the one hand, their aim is to support the economy with fiscal policy measures and to limit the damage caused by the pandemic; on the other hand, any structural change that needs to happen should not be delayed unnecessarily. Furthermore, possible cliff effects should be taken into consideration. There is a threat of these materializing, for instance, if insufficient provision is made for the fact that time-limited measures will be discontinued, with ensuing large-scale adjustments in the real economy or financial system.
Keywords: Europe, Germany, Banking, Financial Stability Review, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Stress Scenarios, Insolvency Risk, Real Estate, Bundesbank
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleBoM Revises Guideline on Outsourcing by Financial Institutions
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.