PBC launched a consultation on the rules for verification of standard debt-based assets. The proposed rules clarify and list the standard and non-standard debt-based assets, in addition to providing the verification criteria and the related regulatory arrangements. To standardize financial institutions’ investment in asset management products, strengthen investor protection, promote sound development of direct financing, and prevent financial risks effectively, the draft rules have been formulated in accordance with the Guidelines of PBC, CBIRC, CSRC, and State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Regulating Asset Management by Financial Institutions. The deadline for comments is November 10, 2019. The rules shall take effect on the day of their official release. PBC also released questions and answers (Q&As) related to the draft rules.
Under the rules, standard debt-based assets refer to bonds, asset-backed securities, and other fixed-income securities, which are issued according to the relevant regulations. Other fixed-income securities include treasury bonds, central bank bills, local government bonds, financial bonds, debt-financing instruments for non-financial enterprises, bonds issued by international institutions, interbank certificates of deposit, credit asset-backed securities, asset-backed bills, and asset-backed securities listed for trading on stock exchanges. The rules further specify that to be recognized as standard debt-based assets, other debt-based assets are required to meet requirements related to the following:
- Equal division and tradability
- Information disclosure
- Centralized registration and independent custody
- Fair-value pricing and sound liquidity mechanism
- Trading of assets on markets approved by the State Council
Comment Due Date: November 10, 2019
Keywords: Asia Pacific, China, Banking, Securities, Asset-backed Securities, Debt-based Securities, Asset Management, PBC
Previous ArticlePRA Consults on Treatment of Restricted Tier 1 Own Funds Instruments
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting