EU ambassadors of member states agreed om the mandate of European Council for negotiations with the European Parliament on proposed amendments to the Benchmark Regulation (2016/1011). In July, EC had proposed to amend EU rules on financial benchmarks against the background of the transition to new reference rates on major capital markets, particularly in the backdrop of an expected phasing out of LIBOR by the end of 2021. European Council takes the view that the current rules that allow supervised entities in EU to make use of third-country benchmarks should continue to apply until the end of 2025 and not 2021, thus allowing smooth transition to a list of exempted benchmarks to be drawn up by EC.
In its negotiating mandate, European Council takes the view that the powers of EC should apply to a broader range of contracts and financial instruments that reference a benchmark than is proposed by EC. The expanded scope includes both financial contracts and instruments that are subject to the law of an EU member state and certain third-country law contracts. European Council also provides for the possible statutory replacement of benchmarks that do have a fallback provision for the cessation of a benchmark, but where the application of that clause would challenge financial stability and disrupt the market in a member state. On the basis of this negotiating mandate, the presidency will start negotiations with the European Parliament as soon as the Parliament has adopted its position.
At present, the Benchmark Regulation does not address the possibility of cessation of a critical benchmark. The aim of these amendments is to create a framework that would allow a statutory replacement rate to be in place by the time a systemically important benchmark such as LIBOR is no longer in use. This will reduce legal uncertainty regarding legacy contracts and avoid risks to financial stability. The new rules give EC the power to designate a statutory replacement rate to take the place of all references to a benchmark whose cessation would result in significant disruption to the functioning of financial markets in EU. When designating a statutory replacement rate, EC would have to take into account the recommendations of the dedicated working groups on replacement rates. In addition, the new rules ensure that EU benchmark users can, for the time being, continue to rely on third-country spot exchange rates to hedge the exchange-rate risk.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Benchmarks Regulation, LIBOR, Financial Benchmarks, Benchmark Reforms, Interest Rate Benchmarks, EC, European Council
Previous ArticleEC Deems UK Framework for CCPs Temporarily Equivalent to EMIR Rules
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.