CPMI and IOSCO Consult on Guidance on Stablecoin Arrangements
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems. The consultative report contains guidance on the application of the Principles for Financial Market Infrastructures (PFMI) to systemically important stablecoin arrangements. Regulators seek feedback, by December 01, 2021, on the consultative report in general as well as on the questions set out in the report. The standard-setters acknowledge that some issues identified in this report may require further clarification and follow-up work in 2022 and beyond, as the features of certain projects and stablecoin arrangement functions evolve.
Stablecoin arrangements may present some notable and novel features, which relate to the potential use of settlement assets that are neither central bank money nor commercial bank money and carry additional financial risk; the novel features also relate to, the interdependencies between multiple stablecoin arrangements functions, the degree of decentralization of operations and/or governance, and a potential large-scale deployment of emerging technologies such as the distributed ledger technology. This report proposes guidance on the application of the PFMI with respect to these features of stablecoin arrangements, which should help stablecoin arrangements and relevant authorities in applying the PFMI to systemically important stablecoin arrangements. The guidance covers issues related to governance, comprehensive risk management, settlement finality, and money settlements:
- When seeking to observe this principle of governance, a systemically important stablecoin arrangements should consider how the stablecoin arrangements' ownership structure and operation allow for clear and direct lines of responsibility and accountability.
- A systemically important stablecoin arrangement should develop appropriate risk-management frameworks and tools and should identify and implement appropriate mitigants, taking an integrated and comprehensive view of its risks.
- A systemically important stablecoin arrangement should provide clear and final settlement, regardless of the operational settlement method used; it should clearly define the point at which a transfer on the ledger becomes irrevocable and technical settlement happens and make it transparent whether and to what extent there could be a misalignment between technical settlement and legal finality.
- A stablecoin used by a systemically important stablecoin arrangement for money settlements should have little or no credit or liquidity risk. In assessing the risk presented by the stablecoin, the stablecoin arrangement should consider whether the stablecoin provides its holders with a direct legal claim on the issuer and/or claim on, title to or interest in the underlying reserve assets for timely convertibility at par into other liquid assets such as claims on a central bank. It should also consider whether the stablecoin has a clear and robust process for fulfilling holders’ claims in both normal and stressed times.
This report is not intended to create additional standards for stablecoin arrangements but rather to provide more clarity to systemically important stablecoin arrangements and relevant authorities as those stablecoin arrangements seek to observe the PFMI. CPMI and IOSCO may further examine regulatory, supervisory, and oversight issues associated with stablecoin arrangements and, as appropriate, coordinate with other standard-setting bodies to address the outstanding gaps. CPMI and IOSCO believe that guidance on the application of the PFMI with respect to these features of stablecoin arrangements is useful for stablecoin arrangements and relevant authorities in applying the PFMI to systemically important stablecoin arrangements. The guidance focuses on a subset of the PFMI for which the CPMI and IOSCO consider that guidance is warranted in light of notable features of stablecoin arrangements as compared to existing financial market infrastructures. This guidance should be read in conjunction with the relevant principles, key considerations, and explanatory notes of the PFMI as well as with the further considerations provided in Section 3. This report is a key contribution to the G20 roadmap on cross-border payments and supports the FSB work in this area.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: December 01, 2021
Keywords: International, Banking, Stablecoin, Fintech, Regtech, Governance, PFMI, FMI, Cross-Border Payments, G20, Operational Risk, Systemic Risk, CPMI, IOSCO
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Blake Coules
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
APRA Updates Loan Serviceability Expectations for Home LendingNext Article
IFSB Publishes FAQs on Islamic Finance StandardsRelated Articles
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
BIS Bulletin Examines Cognitive Limits of Large Language Models
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
ECB is Conducting First Cyber Risk Stress Test for Banks
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
EBA Continues Momentum Toward Strengthening Prudential Rules for Banks
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
EU and UK Agencies Issue Updates on Final Basel III Rules
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards