EC is consulting member states on a draft proposal to prolong the State aid Temporary Framework until June 30, 2021 and adjust its scope. The temporary framework was adopted on March 19, 2020 to support economy in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak. The temporary framework allows member states to guarantee the availability of sufficient liquidity for businesses of all types and preserve the continuity of economic activity during and after the COVID-19 outbreak.
EC has issued a consultation on the draft proposal to:
- Prolong, at the current limits, existing provisions of the temporary framework (including for liquidity support) for an additional six months until June 30, 2021
- Extend the scope of the temporary framework by enabling member states to contribute to the fixed costs of companies (costs that are not covered by the revenues)
- Adapt the conditions for recapitalization measures under the temporary framework, in particular for the State's exit from enterprises where the State was an existing shareholder prior to the recapitalization
The proposed changes would allow the State to exit from the equity of such enterprises through an independent valuation, while maintaining the safeguards to preserve effective competition in the Single Market. The temporary framework was first amended in April 2020. In May 2020, EC adopted a second amendment extending the scope of the temporary framework to recapitalization and subordinated debt measures. In June 2020, EC adopted a third amendment extending the scope of the temporary framework to further support micro, small, and startup companies and incentivize private investments. The temporary framework was initially set to expire on December 31, 2020, except for recapitalization measures that may be granted until June 30, 2021.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Temporary Framework, State Aid Rules, Credit Risk, EC
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleECB Takes Another Step to Investigate Possibility of a Digital Euro
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.