The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) welcomed the proposals of the European Commission (EC) on the review of Solvency II Directive. The proposals largely share EIOPA’s approach and follow the objectives set in EIOPA’s opinion on the review of Solvency II from December 2020. In particular, EIOPA welcomed the proposals to develop an Insurance Recovery and Resolution Directive, to include the macro-prudential perspective in Solvency II, to enhance the proportionality principle, and to give mandates for further action on sustainable finance. The new extrapolation methodology of the risk-free curve, the adjustments of the interest risk rate, and the additional tools and measures to address systemic risk are also welcome steps.
From a perspective of consumer protection, EIOPA deeply regrets that the minimum harmonization of the Insurance Guarantee Schemes at the European Union level has not been considered. The review of Solvency II and the newly proposed Insurance Recovery and Resolution Directive constituted an excellent window of opportunity to address the existing fragmentation in the field of Insurance Guarantee Schemes. As a result of the current fragmentation, policyholders receive different levels of protection in the event of an insurer’s failure operating within the European Union, depending on the country from where the insurance policy originates. Consequently, EIOPA continues to believe that this issue needs to be tackled as it may seriously undermine the functioning of and trust in the European Single Market.
To avoid scenarios that harm policyholders, an important element of Solvency II is its prudence. The EIOPA advice recommended a more favorable but prudent treatment of illiquid liabilities as well as a balanced update overall. In the view of EIOPA, the removal of illiquidity considerations for the purpose of volatility adjustment calculations on the one hand and relaxations regarding the calibration on the risk margin and interest risk capital charge on the other pose potential risks. While EIOPA is pleased with the consideration taken on board that low-risk insurers would be relieved of certain requirements, it is important that the proportionality principle in Solvency II is embedded in the supervisory review process. This approach would give the supervisors more flexibility to allow application by insurers of proportionality also during the supervisory review process. This would keep proportionality as a principle instead of transforming it into a "set of rules." EIOPA states that it stands ready to support the European Commission, Parliament, and Council in the review process.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reinsurance, Solvency II, Sustainable Finance, Resolution Framework, Proportionality, Insurance Guarantee Schemes, Interest Rate Risk, Insurance Recovery and Resolution Directive, Climate Change Risk, EC, EIOPA
Previous ArticleEIOPA and Joint Committee of ESAs Publish Work Programs
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.