ESMA published a statement that sets out the impact of Brexit on the ESMA Register for benchmark administrators and third-country benchmarks under the Benchmarks Regulation. The statement highlights that, post Brexit transition, the existing UK administrators will be deleted from the ESMA Register, as, by then, the Benchmarks Regulation will no longer be applicable to the benchmark administrators in UK. ESMA also published a final report setting out the updated regulatory technical standards that contain provisions ensuring that the governance arrangements of benchmark administrators are sufficiently robust and the potential manipulation of benchmarks is minimized, through additional rules on the methodology of calculation and controls to ensure the integrity of the data. These draft standards result from the ESAs Review and are expected to be submitted, by October 01, 2020, to EC, which will have three months in which to approve or reject them.
After the transition period for the withdrawal of UK from EU ends on December 31, 2020, UK administrators (that are included in the ESMA Register) will be deleted from the ESMA Register as the Benchmarks Regulation will by then no longer be applicable to the benchmark administrators in UK. During the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period until December 31, 2021, as defined in Article 51(4) of the Benchmarks Regulation, this change of the ESMA Register would not have an effect on the ability of EU27 supervised entities to use the benchmarks provided by those third-country UK administrators. During the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period, third-country benchmarks can still be used by supervised entities in EU if the benchmark is already used in EU as a reference for financial instruments, financial contracts, or for measuring the performance of an investment fund. Therefore, until December 31, 2021, EU supervised entities can use third-country UK benchmarks even if they are not included in the ESMA Register. This Benchmarks Regulation transitional provision would be applicable to the benchmarks provided by the UK administrators deleted from the ESMA Register because of Brexit.
In the absence of an equivalence decision by EC, UK administrators will have until the end of the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period of December 31, 2021 to apply for recognition or endorsement in EU, for the benchmarks provided by these UK administrators to be included in the ESMA Register again. Similarly, if some UK third-country benchmarks were included in the ESMA Register before the end of the Brexit transition period following a recognition or an endorsement status granted by the UK, those third-country benchmarks will be deleted from the ESMA Register after the end of the Brexit transition period. The Benchmarks Regulation transitional period until December 31, 2021 is also applicable to these third-country benchmarks endorsed or recognized in the UK. Therefore, during the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period, this deletion from the ESMA Register would not have an effect on the ability of EU27 supervised entities to use those third-country benchmarks that were endorsed or recognized in the UK before the end of the Brexit transition period. In the absence of an equivalence decision by EC, these third-country benchmarks previously endorsed or recognized in the UK will have until the end of the Benchmarks Regulation transitional period of December 31, 2021 to apply again for recognition or endorsement in EU, to be included in the ESMA Register.
- Press Release on Impact of Brexit
- Statement on Impact of Brexit (PDF)
- Press Release on Technical Standards
- Report on Technical Standards
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, Securities, Transition Period, Third Country Benchmarks, Regulatory Technical Standards, Benchmarks Regulation, ESMA
Previous ArticleEIB Provides Guarantee to Commerzbank to Support SMEs Amid Crisis
Next ArticleESRB Publishes Risk Dashboard in October 2020
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
ECB finalized guidance on the way it expects banks to prudently manage and transparently disclose climate and other environmental risks under the current prudential rules.
BCBS published a technical amendment to the capital treatment of securitizations of non-performing loans by banks.
BoE announced that the Data and Statistics Division is planning to move collection of statistical data to the BoE Electronic Data Submission (BEEDS) portal.
APRA published the updated reporting standards and guidance for the collection of Economic and Financial Statistics (EFS), following a consultation process. Also published was a response letter to the feedback received on the proposal for amending the EFS reporting standards and guidance.
EC is consulting on a draft delegated regulation to supplement the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable.
The IFRS Foundation published material highlighting the ways in which existing requirements in IFRS standards require companies to consider climate-related matters when their effect is material to the financial statements.
FSB published a progress report on the implementation of reforms to major interest rate benchmarks, including the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark.