The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups. These are the good practices that have helped crisis management groups to enhance preparedness for the management and resolution of a cross-border financial crisis affecting a global systemically important bank (G-SIB). While many of these practices have been well-established, others are emerging or developing. The good practices identified in the report relate to the structure and operation of crisis management groups, resolution policy, strategy, and resolvability assessments; coordination on enhancing the resolvability of a firm; and enhancing home-host coordination arrangements for crisis preparedness.
The crisis management groups bring together the home and key host authorities that have a role in the resolution of a systemically important financial institution. The report provides a reference for home and host authorities in crisis management groups to help them enhance their crisis management preparedness. It draws on a 2020 stock-take exercise on how G-SIB home and host authorities use and operate crisis management groups as well as on the experience of members of crisis management groups during the COVID-19 pandemic. The focus is on activities of crisis management groups that seek to enhance crisis preparedness rather than on cooperation during a crisis. The good practices identified in this report are organized along 16 desired outcomes that crisis management groups seek to achieve, including the following:
- The structure and operation of crisis management groups. Crisis management group membership and structures reflect the specificities of the firm, its business model, and geographic footprint. The crisis management group is underpinned by an institution-specific cooperation agreement that facilitates the necessary crisis management planning, and cooperation, between the relevant authorities.
- Resolution policy, strategy, and resolvability assessments. The members of a crisis management group are kept informed of firm-specific and regulatory resolution planning related developments in relevant home and host jurisdictions. The members also review the resolution strategy and operational resolution plan annually or when there are material changes to a firm’s business or structure. The crisis management group serves as a forum for coordinating resolvability assessments, sharing findings, discussing any remaining barriers to resolvability, and plans to removing these barriers. The crisis management group also serves as a forum for the firm to present its progress on resolvability and for the members to ask questions to facilitate their review and monitoring.
- Coordination on enhancing the resolvability of a firm. The members of crisis management group review a firm’s capabilities to support resolution, with a view to obtaining comfort over their operationalization and reliability at the group and local levels. The members also have a clear understanding of the needed data to inform the decisions of authorities in a crisis and in resolution. Additionally, the members coordinate expectations for, and feedback to, the firm on its resolution capabilities and progress toward resolvability.
- Enhancement of home-host coordination arrangements for crisis preparedness. The members have a clear understanding of each other's internal decision-making and execution processes. Also, the members and their representatives maintain strong working relationships to support effective coordination in a crisis. Communications between representatives beyond formal meetings, such as bilateral meetings, workshops, or calls, have helped to strengthen interpersonal relationships.
As crisis management groups continue to evolve in performing their activities, FSB will continue to monitor the development of their practices and consider any future work to promote consistency and effective operation of crisis management groups.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Crisis Management, G-SIB, Good Practices, Resolution Framework, Resolvability Assessment, Operational Risk, Governance, FSB
Previous ArticleOSFI Updates Timeline for Implementation of Certain Basel Rules
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular, along with the reporting form and instructions, for self-assessment, by authorized institutions, of compliance with the Code of Banking Practice 2021.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to register European DataWarehouse Ltd and SecRep Limited as securitization repositories under the UK Securitization Regulation, with effect from January 17, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) published a circular with instructions on emergency liquidity assistance to banks that are unable to meet their liquidity requirements.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.