EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios. Through this consultation, EIOPA is responding to a Call for Advice addressed to the three ESAs, to support EC in developing the definitions and methodologies to be used for the disclosure requirements stemming from the Taxonomy Regulation. The public consultation closes on January 12, 2021, with the EIOPA expecting to finalize its advice and submit to EC in February 2021.
EIOPA seeks feedback and comments on the proposed ratios as well as the potential alternative measures, the necessary disclosures around the approaches taken, methodologies used, and the expected impact of the future mandatory disclosures. In this consultation, EIOPA is considering whether the mandatory ratios of non-financial undertakings, as set out in the Taxonomy Regulation, are relevant and appropriate to depict insurance and reinsurance activities or whether they need to be translated to the most appropriate and comparable key performance indicators for insurance and reinsurance businesses. EIOPA suggests requiring two most relevant key performance indicators on sustainability that depict the extent to which an insurer or reinsurer conducts taxonomy-relevant activities in relation to non-life gross premiums written and helps in funding taxonomy-related activities in relation to total assets
The Call for Advice had requested EIOPA to develop the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by the insurance undertakings falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive. This consultation paper presents the related EIOPA advice regarding Article 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation, which specifies the ratios that have to be depicted by non-financial undertakings. EIOPA is considering whether the mandatory ratios of non-financial undertakings, as set out by Article 8 of the Taxonomy Regulation, are relevant and appropriate to depict insurance and reinsurance activities or whether they need to be "translated" to the most appropriate and comparable key performance indicators for insurance and reinsurance businesses. For that, the Call for Advice further specified three insurance-specific ratios as a possible starting point: proportion of total assets invested in taxonomy-compliant economic activities; proportion of total non-life insurance underwriting exposure associated with taxonomy activities; and proportion of total reinsurance underwriting exposure associated with taxonomy activities. This consultation paper is part of the broader sustainability agenda of EIOPA to integrate environmental, social, and governance risk assessment in the regulatory and supervisory framework.
Comment Due Date: January 12, 2021
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reporting, Disclosures, NFRD, Taxonomy Regulation, Climate Change Risk, ESG, Sustainable Finance, EIOPA
Dr. Denton provides industry leadership in the quantification of sustainability issues, climate risk, trade credit and emerging lending risks. His deep foundations in market and credit risk provide critical perspectives on how climate/sustainability risks can be measured, communicated and used to drive commercial opportunities, policy, strategy, and compliance. He supports corporate clients and financial institutions in leveraging Moody’s tools and capabilities to improve decision-making and compliance capabilities, with particular focus on the energy, agriculture and physical commodities industries.
Previous ArticleCMF Issues Rule for Identification of Systemically Important Banks
Next ArticleFSC Taiwan Launches Green Finance Action Plan 2.0
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.