CFPB Director Questions Resolvability of Eight Largest Banks
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Director, Rohit Chopra issued a statement expressing his opinion on the resolution plans, or living wills, submitted by the eight largest domestic banks.
The statement on 2021 resolution plans highlights that banks did not submit full resolution plans instead they submitted partial plans, pursuant to a legal exemption put into place in 2019. Based on the analysis of these partial plans, the statement notes that Citigroup’s plan was not credible, particularly in light of the enforcement actions issued in October 2020 by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The statement also notes that these global systemically important financial institutions will submit complete plans next year in 2023, which will be more robust than the partial plans submitted in 2022. It is critical to evaluate those plans with appropriate legal standard and with sufficient rigor.
In 2021, JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, State Street, and Bank of New York Mellon did not submit full resolution plans. Instead, they submitted partial plans, pursuant to a legal exemption put into place in 2019. These institutions are truly systemically important, with a combined USD 18 trillion in financial exposures, USD 124 trillion in client assets under custody, over 12,000 subsidiaries, and on average operate in 50 countries. Based on the analysis of these partial plans, it is clear that Citigroup’s plan is not at all credible, particularly in light of the enforcement actions two years ago by the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. The CFPB Director is in favor of issuing the feedback letters, because he agrees with certain identified areas for improvement, but does not believe that Citigroup is the only institution without a credible plan. It is highly unlikely that any of these institutions, as currently constituted, could be resolved in a rapid and orderly manner under the bankruptcy code. He raised the following issues in his statement:
- He questioned whether there are adequate safeguards to ensure the board members at these institutions will file for bankruptcy at the appropriate time.
- He does not believe these firms would be able to obtain adequate financing for an orderly court-supervised bankruptcy due to their size, complexity, and the magnitude of their short-term financing needs. Nor is it wise to alternatively assume that the unprecedented strategy of self-financing the bankruptcy would be successful.
- These firms are so large and deeply interconnected with the economy that they could inflict severe costs on businesses and households as they spiral toward failure, even before they file for bankruptcy. Regulators may ultimately step in, again, to bail them out and limit the damage.
The partial and full plans submitted this past cycle and in previous cycles will certainly be helpful if the Secretary of the Treasury opts to address a failing systemically important financial institution outside of the bankruptcy process through a resolution supervised by the FDIC. The law requires regulators to judge if the submitted resolution plans will work in a regulator-facilitated, court-supervised bankruptcy proceeding. As of now, this seems like a fairy tale. Ending “too big to fail” continues to be a goal, but it is not yet a reality. Next year, these global systemically important financial institutions will submit complete plans, which will be more robust than the partial plans submitted last year. The CFPB Director believes that it is critical to evaluate those plans using the appropriate legal standard and with sufficient rigor.
Related Link: Statement on 2021 Resolution Plans
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Reporting, Resolution Planning, Basel, Resolution Framework, FDIC, CFBP
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Scott is a Director in the Regulatory and Accounting Solutions team responsible for providing accounting expertise across solutions, products, and services offered by Moody’s Analytics in the US. He has over 15 years of experience leading auditing, consulting and accounting policy initiatives for financial institutions.
Previous ArticleSwiss Council Adopts Ordinances on Climate Disclosures and Banking
ECB Finds Banks Unprepared for Pillar 3 Climate Risk Disclosures
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of the 2022 supervisory assessment of climate-related and environmental risk disclosures among significant institutions (103) and a selected number of less significant institutions (28).
NCUA Assesses Credit Union Exposure to Climate-Related Physical Risks
The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) released a Research Note that examines the exposure of credit unions to climate-related physical risks. In a related development
EBA Issues Multiple Regulatory and Reporting Updates for Banks
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking comments, until July 31, 2023, on the draft Guidelines on the proposed common approach to the resubmission of historical data under the EBA reporting framework.
EC Adopts Regulation on Own Funds, Issues Other Updates
The European Commission adopted Delegated Regulations on own funds and eligible liabilities, on requirements for the internal methodology under the internal default risk model
CDP Platform to Report Plastic-Related Impact, Issues Other Updates
The Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) announced that its global environmental disclosure platform has enabled reporting on plastic-related impact for nearly 7,000 companies worldwide
IASB to Enhance Reporting of Climate Risks, Proposes IFRS 9 Amendments
The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) updated its work plan to enhance the reporting of climate-related risks in the financial statements,
BIS Addresses Data Gaps and Macro-Prudential Policy for Climate Risks
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a brief paper that examines challenges associated with the use of macro-prudential policies to address climate-related financial risks.
FCA Sets Out Business Plan, Launches TechSprint on Greenwashing
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published its business plan for 2023-24. The plan sets out details of the work planned for the next 12 months to achieve better outcomes for consumers and markets
UK Committee Sets Out Recommendations for Next Phase of Open Banking
The Joint Regulatory Oversight Committee (JROC), comprising the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR) as co-chairs and the HM Treasury and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) as members
ECB Publishes Multiple Regulatory Updates for Banking Institutions
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of the 2022 climate risk stress test of the Eurosystem balance sheet,