EIOPA Publishes Report on Use of Capital Add-Ons Under Solvency II
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published its annual report on the use of capital add-ons during 2020. The analysis included in the report is based on 2020 year-end data collected under Directive 2009/138/EC (Solvency II) as reported by the solo undertakings or insurance groups from the European Economic Area; this was complemented by a dedicated survey for national competent authorities that entailed both qualitative and quantitative questions.
The objective of the capital add-on measure is to ensure that the regulatory capital requirements reflect the risk profile of the solo undertaking or of the insurance group. Therefore, it is important that national competent authorities use it when needed, with the aim to ensure a high degree of supervisory convergence in its application. It is also important to maintain a level playing field regarding the setting of capital add-ons. During 2020, two national competent authorities that set capital add-ons in the previous years no longer set capital add-ons in 2020. This situation led to a number of capital add-ons set at the end of 2020 even lower than in 2019. In 2020, seven national competent authorities set capital add-ons to nine solo undertakings (six non-life and three life undertakings respectively), while, in 2019, nine national competent authorities had set capital add-ons to ten solo undertakings, including two life, seven non-life undertakings and one composite (excluding the capital add-ons set by the UK in the past). For groups, similarly to 2019, no capital add-ons were set during 2020.
Due to the low number of capital add-ons, the weight of capital add-ons imposed on undertakings using the standard formula remains very low overall in 2020 (that is, less than 0.1% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement of all undertakings). However, it remains significant when considering the amount at individual level accounting for 25% of the total Solvency Capital Requirement of the undertakings with capital add-ons. Although there is a wide range in its distribution (from 86% to 1%), in all cases (except for one) the capital add-on increases the Solvency Capital Requirement by at least 10%. Following the findings of the survey, in view of a decreasing number of capital add-ons at an already low level, EIOPA will continue to monitor the usage of capital add-ons and pay attention on the proposals made by national competent authorities on how to make a more efficient use of this tool in the future.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Reinsurance, Solvency II, SCR, Capital Add-Ons, Solvency Capital Requirement, EIOPA
Featured Experts
Paul McCarney
Insurance product strategist; insurance domain expert; extensive experience developing risk assessment frameworks for insurers
Brian Robinson
Actuary; risk management specialist; corporate and capital modelling expert
Previous Article
EC Consults on Review of Mortgage Credit DirectiveRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
