FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions. The report highlights the need for resolution preparedness and discusses lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic, which confirmed the importance of ongoing work on resolvability for banks, insurers, and central counterparties (CCPs). The report concludes that improved capabilities for monitoring the financial condition of firms and for cooperation and communication in a crisis, although not yet perfect, have served authorities well.
In the banking sector, the sixth round of the resolvability assessment process conducted during 2019-2020 confirmed that crisis management groups are broadly satisfied with the progress of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) toward resolvability. Global systemically important banks (G-SIBs) are estimated to already meet the final 2022 minimum external total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirement. TLAC-eligible bond issuance has continued through the difficult COVID-19 pandemic environment and the market has, so far, absorbed issuance without difficulty. Disclosure of external TLAC levels by G-SIBs has improved over the past year. However, little information is available to market participants on the distribution of TLAC within banking groups. Work is ongoing on the management, distribution and transferability of these resources. The report identified some remaining obstacles to resolvability and gaps that to be addressed.
In the insurance sector, FSB continues to monitor implementation of the Key Attributes. Progress on implementation of national insurance resolution regimes has slowed down, with no significant reforms, such as finalization of new or enhanced insurance resolution frameworks, reported in this recent cycle. The FSB Key Attributes Assessment Methodology (KAAM) for the insurance sector, which was published in August 2020, may also be a useful tool for a jurisdiction that is adopting a new resolution regime or reviewing, reforming, or making improvements to its existing regimes. A number of jurisdictions have identified systemically important insurers for purpose of recovery and resolution planning. Key areas of attention for FSB work on resolution planning for insurers are intra-group interconnectedness and funding in resolution. Furthermore, in the event of a 2022 decision to discontinue the global systemically important insurers (G-SIIs) list, FSB will review the scope of application of G-SII specific requirements in consultation with IAIS.
Central counterparties are also increasing in importance, given that the recent periods of market turmoil have demonstrated the benefits that central clearing brings for global financial stability. CPMI and IOSCO coordinated a review, which qualified thirteen central counterparties as systemically important in more than one jurisdiction. Some progress has been made in resolution planning for systemically important central counterparties in more than one jurisdiction. Authorities have established crisis management groups and commenced resolution planning for all central counterparties identified as systemically important in more than one jurisdiction, with the exception of one central counterparty that was added to the list of systemically important central counterparties in more than one jurisdiction in the August review. To support discussions on central counterparty resolvability and adequacy of financial resources for resolution, FSB recently issued a guidance on financial resources to support central counterparty resolution and on the treatment of central counterparty equity in resolution. FSB also developed, in 2020, a resolvability assessment process questionnaire that will be used for the first time in the 2021 for central counterparties that systemically important in more than one jurisdiction. Summary findings from the 2021 central counterparty resolvability assessment process will be included in the 2021 resolution report of FSB. The Chairs of FSB, CPMI, IOSCO, and the FSB Resolution Steering Group agreed to collaborate on and conduct further work on central counterparty financial resources through their respective committees.
Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, FMI, COVID-19, Crisis Management Framework, CCPs, Resolution Planning, Resolution Framework, FSB
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleEBA Benchmarks National Insolvency Frameworks Across EU
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
OSFI Announces Pilot Project on Climate Change Scenario Analysis