ESMA published the final report updating its guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime under the Credit Rating Agencies (CRA) Regulation. The guidelines on the application of the endorsement regime will take effect on January 01, 2019. ESMA also published its final report on Technical Advice on CRA regulatory equivalence—CRA 3 update. CRA 3 will enter into force on June 01, 2018 for the purposes of endorsement and equivalence.
The report on the application of endorsement regime details a number of changes and clarifications to the existing guidelines. The updates focus on the obligations of the endorsing CRA, the conduct of the third-country CRA, and the third-country legal and supervisory framework. The report also clarifies ESMA’s supervisory powers over endorsed credit ratings and the notion of objective reasons. The effective date of January 01, 2019 for the endorsement regime will allow CRAs sufficient time to adapt policies and procedures to take into account ESMA’s additional guidance on the requirements, which are as stringent as EU requirements that are to be developed by ESMA in 2018. The final report on the Technical Advice to the EC assesses the legal and supervisory framework of the nine jurisdictions (Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Hong Kong, Japan, Mexico, Singapore, and United States), which until now have been eligible for equivalence and endorsement.
The entry into force of the 2013 amendments to the CRA Regulation (CRA 3), and the associated introduction of new requirements to endorsed ratings in 2018, provided an opportunity for ESMA to review the regime more broadly. Endorsement is a regime under the CRA Regulation, which allows credit ratings issued by a third-country CRA, and endorsed by an EU CRA, to be used for regulatory purposes in the EU. Endorsement is used by the largest CRAs in the EU. Equivalence allows a non-systemic CRA without any physical presence in the EU to be certified by ESMA. At present, four certified CRAs located in three non-EU jurisdictions rely on this regime. ESMA has concluded that the local legal and supervisory frameworks of these three jurisdictions, as well as those of Canada and Hong Kong, meet the objectives of the additional CRA 3 requirements for the purposes of equivalence. The countries whose legal and supervisory frameworks were assessed as not fully meeting the requirements are Argentina, Australia, Brazil and Singapore. However, the CRAs established in these jurisdictions currently rely only on the endorsement regime—not on equivalence.
- Final Report on Endorsement Regime Guidelines (PDF)
- Technical Advice on CRA Regulatory Equivalence (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Securities, CRA 3, CRA Regulation, Equivalence, Endorsement Regime, ESMA
Previous ArticleDNB Issued Banking Newsletter for June 2017
Next ArticleESMA Updates Q&A on MiFID II Implementation
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
HKMA, together with the Banking Sector Small and Medium-Size Enterprise (SME) Lending Coordination Mechanism, announced a ninety-day repayment deferment for trade facilities under the Pre-approved Principal Payment Holiday Scheme.
The Advisory Scientific Committee of ESRB published a response, in the form of an Insights Paper, to the EBA proposals for reforms to the stress testing framework in EU.
MAS announced several initiatives to support adoption of the Singapore Overnight Rate Average (SORA), which is administered by MAS.
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.
PRA published the policy statement PS19/20 on the final policy for extending coverage under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) for Temporary High Balance.
EBA published the final draft implementing technical standards for disclosures and reporting on the minimum requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL) and the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements in EU.
EBA published an erratum for the phase 2 of technical package on the reporting framework 2.10.
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2020/1145, which lays down technical information for calculation of technical provisions and basic own funds.