Featured Product

    FSI Examines Use of Red Team Testing to Enhance Cyber Resilience

    November 15, 2019

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a paper that examines the contribution of red team testing frameworks toward enhancing cyber resilience. The paper describes key components of a red team testing framework, compares the existing frameworks, outlines the benefits and challenges of these frameworks, and highlights the potential cross-border issues in the area of red team testing. In terms of policy implementation, the paper emphasizes that, to take red team testing to the next level, consideration could be given to addressing the legal, operational, and regulatory challenges in coordinating cross-border red team testing for internationally active financial institutions.

    The paper is based on information provided by eight financial authorities and selected private-sector players. Most of the surveyed jurisdictions have red team testing frameworks in place, although the objectives and implementation details may differ. The paper covers the red team testing frameworks for financial institutions in EU (including the Netherlands), Hong Kong SAR, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and the UK. The paper highlights that the international standards on cyber resilience of financial institutions have raised the bar in terms of defining the expectations on firms. Central to this is the use of red team testing as one of the tests that firms can undertake to assess resilience against realistic cyber attacks and strengthen their cyber resilience. 

    Nevertheless, there are challenges to be overcome and certain facilitating conditions appear to be instrumental in supporting effective implementation of red team testing. Such conditions include a conducive governance structure, an engaged board of directors, a supportive risk culture and, critically, the availability of sound professional skills. In certain jurisdictions, an accreditation framework has been established to boost local capacities. One culture-related hurdle to overcome is getting firms and authorities to view a red team test as a “learn and improve” rather than a “pass or fail” exercise. Other challenges in connection with red team testing include the high cost to firms, trust among the involved parties, and data confidentiality.

    Extending red team testing beyond jurisdictional borders is important to minimize potential cyber resilience blind spots, given that cyber attackers could attack any part of the attack surface of a financial institution. In addition, cross-border technological dependencies could give rise to systemic implications if cyber attackers succeed in exploiting vulnerabilities that could trigger such chain events. The paper recommends the following policy actions going forward:

    • Financial sector authorities may wish to clarify how red team tests fit within their strategies to improve the cyber resilience of financial institutions. This will help provide regulatory certainty to firms and prompt concrete actions to improve their cyber resilience postures.
    • Consideration should also be given to clarifying how red team tests fit within an institution’s cyber resilience framework, which in turn should be coherently considered in its enterprise-wide risk management framework.
    • Authorities should continue to assess the effectiveness of their frameworks and use the lessons learned from each test to improve the overall cyber resilience of the financial sector.
    • Authorities may need to enhance cooperation with other relevant authorities and parties to enable effective implementation of the frameworks.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, PMI, Cyber Resilience, Red Teaming Framework, Cyber Risk, Research, CBEST, TIBER-EU, FSI, BIS

    Related Articles
    News

    FSB Sets Out Effective Practices for Cyber Incident Recovery

    FSB finalized the toolkit of effective practices to assist financial institutions in their cyber incident response and recovery activities.

    October 19, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HKMA Urges Early Action for Adherence to IBOR Fallbacks Protocol

    HKMA urged authorized institutions to take early action to adhere to the IBOR Fallbacks Protocol, which ISDA is expected to publish soon.

    October 16, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Sets Out Roadmap for Transition to Alternative Reference Rates

    FSB published a global transition roadmap for London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR).

    October 16, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Response to Proposal on BRRD2 Transposition

    HM Treasury published a document that summarizes the responses received from a consultation on the approach of UK to transposition of the revised Bank Resolution and Recovery Directive (BRRD2).

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    HM Treasury Publishes Response to Proposal on CRD5 Transposition

    HM Treasury published the government response to the feedback received on the consultation for updating the prudential regime of UK before the end of the Brexit transition period.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Reporting Schedule for Statistical Returns

    In a recent statistical notice, BoE announced publication of the reporting schedule for statistical returns for 2021.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Welcomes Declaration by Member States on EU Cloud Federation

    EC welcomed the joint declaration by 25 EU member states on building the next generation of cloud in Europe.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    MAS Amends Notice on Issuance of Covered Bonds by Banks in Singapore

    MAS published amendments to Notice 648 on the issuance of covered bonds by banks incorporated in Singapore.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FDIC Selects Technology Companies for Rapid Prototyping Competition

    FDIC has selected 14 technology companies—including Accenture Federal Services, LLC, Fed Reporter, Inc, and S&P Global Market Intelligence, LLC—for inclusion in the next phase of the rapid prototyping competition.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    GLEIF Defines New Validation Agent Role for Financial Institutions

    GLEIF announced that financial institutions worldwide can realize a variety of cost, efficiency, and customer experience benefits by assuming a new “validation agent” role within the Global Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) System.

    October 15, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5979