Featured Product

    FSI Examines Use of Red Team Testing to Enhance Cyber Resilience

    November 15, 2019

    The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a paper that examines the contribution of red team testing frameworks toward enhancing cyber resilience. The paper describes key components of a red team testing framework, compares the existing frameworks, outlines the benefits and challenges of these frameworks, and highlights the potential cross-border issues in the area of red team testing. In terms of policy implementation, the paper emphasizes that, to take red team testing to the next level, consideration could be given to addressing the legal, operational, and regulatory challenges in coordinating cross-border red team testing for internationally active financial institutions.

    The paper is based on information provided by eight financial authorities and selected private-sector players. Most of the surveyed jurisdictions have red team testing frameworks in place, although the objectives and implementation details may differ. The paper covers the red team testing frameworks for financial institutions in EU (including the Netherlands), Hong Kong SAR, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and the UK. The paper highlights that the international standards on cyber resilience of financial institutions have raised the bar in terms of defining the expectations on firms. Central to this is the use of red team testing as one of the tests that firms can undertake to assess resilience against realistic cyber attacks and strengthen their cyber resilience. 

    Nevertheless, there are challenges to be overcome and certain facilitating conditions appear to be instrumental in supporting effective implementation of red team testing. Such conditions include a conducive governance structure, an engaged board of directors, a supportive risk culture and, critically, the availability of sound professional skills. In certain jurisdictions, an accreditation framework has been established to boost local capacities. One culture-related hurdle to overcome is getting firms and authorities to view a red team test as a “learn and improve” rather than a “pass or fail” exercise. Other challenges in connection with red team testing include the high cost to firms, trust among the involved parties, and data confidentiality.

    Extending red team testing beyond jurisdictional borders is important to minimize potential cyber resilience blind spots, given that cyber attackers could attack any part of the attack surface of a financial institution. In addition, cross-border technological dependencies could give rise to systemic implications if cyber attackers succeed in exploiting vulnerabilities that could trigger such chain events. The paper recommends the following policy actions going forward:

    • Financial sector authorities may wish to clarify how red team tests fit within their strategies to improve the cyber resilience of financial institutions. This will help provide regulatory certainty to firms and prompt concrete actions to improve their cyber resilience postures.
    • Consideration should also be given to clarifying how red team tests fit within an institution’s cyber resilience framework, which in turn should be coherently considered in its enterprise-wide risk management framework.
    • Authorities should continue to assess the effectiveness of their frameworks and use the lessons learned from each test to improve the overall cyber resilience of the financial sector.
    • Authorities may need to enhance cooperation with other relevant authorities and parties to enable effective implementation of the frameworks.

     

    Related Links

    Keywords: International, Banking, Insurance, Securities, PMI, Cyber Resilience, Red Teaming Framework, Cyber Risk, Research, CBEST, TIBER-EU, FSI, BIS

    Related Articles
    News

    APRA Updates Lists of Validation and Derivation Rules in December 2019

    APRA updated the lists of the Direct to APRA (D2A) validation and derivation rules for authorized deposit-taking institutions, insurers, and superannuation entities.

    December 13, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Finalizes Prudential Standard for Credit Risk Management of Banks

    APRA updated the prudential standard on credit risk management requirements (APS 220) for authorized deposit-taking institutions, post a public consultation.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Consults on Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance

    EIOPA issued a consultation on guidelines on the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) security and governance by insurers.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Consults on Design of Prudential Treatment for Crypto-Assets

    BCBS published a discussion paper on the design of prudential treatment for crypto-asset exposures of banks.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    NCUA Approves Delay of Risk-Based Capital Rules Until January 2022

    The NCUA Board held its eleventh open meeting of 2019 and approved a final rule to delay the effective date of the risk-based capital rules for credit unions to January 01, 2022.

    December 12, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Issues Operational Risk Rules, Consults on Reporting Requirements

    APRA published an updated prudential standard APS 115 that sets out operational risk requirements for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Q&A on European Benchmarks Regulation in December 2019

    ESMA updated the question and answers (Q&A) document on the European Benchmarks Regulation.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Decides to Keep Countercyclical Capital Buffer for Banks at 0%

    APRA announced its decision to keep the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for authorized deposit-taking institutions on hold at zero percent.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA on Draft Amendments to Indices and Recognized Exchanges Under CRR

    ESMA issued the final report on draft amendments to the Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1646, which specifies the main indices and recognized exchanges, under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), that are relevant to credit institutions and investment firms subject to prudential requirements and trading venues.

    December 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Extends Consultation Period for Capital Requirements for Insurers

    FED is extending comment period for the proposed rule establishing risk-based capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities.

    December 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4316