FED published a working paper that examines the intermediary segmentation in the commercial real estate, or CRE, market. The study shows that bank, life insurer, and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) lender originations differ substantially by interest rate, loan-to-value (LTV), size, property type, and time to maturity at origination. Lenders differ in regulation, funding structure, and other institutional characteristics affecting their incentives to originate particular types of loans and these institutional differences can explain the segmentation in the data. For instance, short-duration liabilities incentivize banks to make short-term, floating-rate loans; risk-sensitive capital requirements incentivize life insurers to make safer loans; and greater diversification enables CMBS to make larger loans.
The study examines the dimensions along which commercial real estate loan originations differ by lender type, the sources of segmentation in the market, and the implications of segmentation for how the market responds to a shock. Banks, life insurers, and CMBS lenders originate the vast majority of U.S. commercial real estate loans. While these lenders compete in the same market, they differ in how they are funded and regulated and, therefore, specialize in loans with different characteristics. The authors harmonize loan-level data across the lenders and review how their CRE portfolios differ. Three intermediary types provision most CRE lending in the United States: banks, life insurers, and CMBS lenders.
For this study, the authors harmonize comprehensive loan-level data sources across lender types and identify key loan terms and property characteristics along which intermediaries segment themselves. The data include granular details on loan terms and property characteristics for the commercial real estate loan portfolios of nearly 30 of the largest banks in the United States, all life insurers, and all loans in publicly issued, non-Agency CMBS deals. They then build a simple model that is informed by the incentives facing the lender types and estimate how various loan terms and property characteristics differentially affect the required return across the lender types. The model allows to estimate the value to borrowers of having access to different types of lenders that vary in how they are regulated and funded.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Insurance, Credit Risk, Commercial Real Estate, LTV, FED
Previous ArticleMAS Amends Notice 122 on Asset and Liability Exposures for Insurers
The use cases of generative AI in the banking sector are evolving fast, with many institutions adopting the technology to enhance customer service and operational efficiency.
As part of the increasing regulatory focus on operational resilience, cyber risk stress testing is also becoming a crucial aspect of ensuring bank resilience in the face of cyber threats.
A few years down the road from the last global financial crisis, regulators are still issuing rules and monitoring banks to ensure that they comply with the regulations.
The European Commission (EC) recently issued an update informing that the European Council and the Parliament have endorsed the Banking Package implementing the final elements of Basel III standards
The Swiss Federal Council recently decided to further develop the Swiss Climate Scores, which it had first launched in June 2022.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) launched consultation on a Pillar 3 disclosure framework for climate-related financial risks, with the comment period ending on February 29, 2024.
The U.S. President Joe Biden signed an Executive Order, dated October 30, 2023, to ensure safe, secure, and trustworthy development and use of artificial intelligence (AI).
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched an integrated digital platform, Gprnt, also known as “Greenprint.”
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has published the final templates, and the associated guidance, for collecting climate-related data for the one-off Fit-for-55 climate risk scenario analysis.
The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) published its latest set of long-term climate macro-financial scenarios (Phase IV) for assessing forward-looking climate risks.